TT deca300 vs Norandren200

gymrat

New member

• Jul 25, 2002

• #1

Has anyone tried the TT deca300? How does it compare to the Brovel Norandren200? I want to take the deca @ 400mg/week on my next cycle and I can use that extra ml difference to add something else in the syringe and save myself some shots.

 

DecaDent*

New member

• Jul 25, 2002

• #2

I've used the TT300 and it worked great,painless and the lower injection volume is a big plus after awhile. Hadden't tried the Brovel....

 

bungybung

New member

• Jul 25, 2002

• #3

I'd take the TT deca any day. I got ridiculous acne from the brovel, and I don't usually get zits with any other deca.

 

T

thundercat

New member

• Jul 25, 2002

• #4

TT deca love it!

 

gymrat

New member

• Jul 26, 2002

• #5

That's kind of funny. I started the same thread on another board and everyone said to stay away from the TT deca and go with the Norandren200.

 

B

boking

New member

• Jul 27, 2002

• #6

used tt deca and t4, very nice!

 

S

spankie

New member

• Jul 29, 2002

• #7

jbmbmmbmbbkkjjbbkjbkjbkijbbkjbkjbkjjoiukk

 

sully

Banana

• Jul 29, 2002

• #8

...used brovel for first cycle and loved it, of course...then have used TT 300 twice, liking it once and hating it once...depends on the individual and/or batch IMO...

 

Taz30

New member

• Jul 29, 2002

• #9

The TT 300 is more like 200mg and the Norandren 200 is like 150mg. Both underdosed but cost effective nonetheless.

 

S

stumpy

New member

• Jul 29, 2002

• #10

definitely go with the tt. more bang for your buck.

btw, im back, i hope