View Full Version : TT deca300 vs Norandren200
gymrat
07-25-2002, 12:01 PM
Has anyone tried the TT deca300? How does it compare to the Brovel Norandren200? I want to take the deca @ 400mg/week on my next cycle and I can use that extra ml difference to add something else in the syringe and save myself some shots.
DecaDent*
07-25-2002, 12:14 PM
I've used the TT300 and it worked great,painless and the lower injection volume is a big plus after awhile. Hadden't tried the Brovel....
bungybung
07-25-2002, 12:30 PM
I'd take the TT deca any day. I got ridiculous acne from the brovel, and I don't usually get zits with any other deca.
thundercat
07-25-2002, 08:58 PM
TT deca love it!
gymrat
07-26-2002, 08:18 AM
That's kind of funny. I started the same thread on another board and everyone said to stay away from the TT deca and go with the Norandren200.
boking
07-27-2002, 06:21 AM
used tt deca and t4, very nice!
spankie
07-29-2002, 10:05 PM
jbmbmmbmbbkkjjbbkjbkjbkijbbkjbkjbkjjoiukk
sully
07-29-2002, 10:10 PM
...used brovel for first cycle and loved it, of course...then have used TT 300 twice, liking it once and hating it once...depends on the individual and/or batch IMO...
Taz30
07-29-2002, 10:28 PM
The TT 300 is more like 200mg and the Norandren 200 is like 150mg. Both underdosed but cost effective nonetheless.
stumpy
07-29-2002, 10:31 PM
definitely go with the tt. more bang for your buck.
btw, im back, i hope
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.