Anyone ever have noticeable hyperplasia from igf?

jtunderdog

MuscleChemistry Registered Member
I can really tell on my left tricep, that I have more muscle tissue in the long head. Do any of you guys notice any radical changes where you have applied igf?
 
the craziest thing that ever happened to me, i put an inch on my calves in 1 month. I was applying igf to the calf region about a year prior... Thats the only reason why i think i could have achieved that.
 
Very noticable in my calves.... about an inch on each one. My chest is thicker, but I can't tell since its a largere muscle and hard to measure.
 
The teardrop muscles in my quads have some noticeable hyperplasia.
 
IGF is IMO the only compound that will ever give you this effect. A lot of people will argue the fact that it is impossible because it is dispersed throughout the body in equal amounts.. but hahaha tell that to the four spots I hit the most with IGF.. and considering it's been over a year since I have used any form of IGF those areas are far more pronounced than any other aspect of my musculature.. [Side delt, calf region, traps and teardrop of quad] ... I also know of many articles that solidify this as a fact and just a couple of them that dispute. It is arguably the most controversial thing out there.
 
^ ^ ^ I completely agree. I was going to mention arms, too, which have been my best bodyparts to date, but having used IGF recently on my quads, the difference is very noticeable.
 
I posted this in another thread but as I am leaning out my short heads on my tris also look way thicker.
 
Thanks, Presser.

whether it actually causes hyperplasia or not is most probably irrelevant... to see proof that it actually gets the target muscle to grow is enough in itself. . i guess it doesn matter if its via hyperplasia or hypertrophy...
 
I've only applyed to shoulders, biceps, and triceps, and I can def see the diff in my biceps and triceps
 
Back
Top