Peptides vs AAS

So, I was reading some this weekend on the differences between running Peptides alone versus running Peptides along side AAS. The other thing was a discussion of whether folks liked just running Peptides versus running AAS.

That got me to thinking....

I'll bet with all the knowledge and personal experience and use of both Peptides and AAS that I could get some great responses and/or debates on this subject.....

So lets hear it fellas......

I have never used any peps

But I am planning on it in the near-ish future

From what I have been reading MOST Pep cycles have some sort of AAS base. Mostly TEST base for the IM. Also, TREST base for the ORALs only crowd.

I have never run igf without gear, but my understanding is that igf induced hyperplasmia is greatly accelerated by the gear. However, I am no scientist and that could be all broscience.

Ive run them alone and together, and IGF with a cycle is PHENOMINAL! But ive also taken just igf with no gear and it kept my muscle bellys nice and full and i kept all my size, strength dropped off after the gear, but you couldnt tell by looking at me.