Is plastic increasing your estrogen level?

napsgearhttps://ugloz.is/ domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsYOURMUSCLESHOPUGFREAK

Jpotch

New member
Gold Member
I thought this article was interesting. I've heard before that BPA's can raise our estrogen levels in our body but have never read anything to back up the claims. What do you guys think? Should we avoid plastic containers and water bottles?





By Wendy Koch, USA TODAY


Most plastic products, even those marketed as BPA-free, leach chemicals that act like the sex hormone estrogen, reveals a new study of 455 common products.

About 70% of the plastic items tested positive for estrogenic activity [EA], but that number jumped to 95% when they were subjected to "real world" conditions such as microwaving and dishwashing, according to the study, published this month in the peer-reviewed journal, Environmental Health Perspectives. Such EA exposure has been shown to alter the structure of human cells, posing potential risks to infants and children.

"Although BPA [bisphenol A] is the most notorious chemical with estrogenic activity used in plastics, it is not the only one, nor does it have the highest biological effect," a study co-author George D. Bittner, a neurobiologist at the University of Texas, Austin, told Chemical & Engineering News.



"Almost all commercially available plastic products we sampled, independent of the type of resin, product, or retail source, leached chemicals having reliably-detectable EA, including those advertised as BPA-free," the study concludes. "In some cases, BPA-free products released chemicals having more EA than BPA-containing products."

The study doesn't identify specific chemicals but suggests plastics could be reformulated, without great expense, to avoid the problem. It was funded in part by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

One of the most ubiquitous chemicals, BPA, has become controversial. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration expressed "some concerns" last year about its potential effects on the brain development of fetuses, infants and children but did not say the chemical's unsafe.

Another recent study found that Americans have twice as much BPA in their bodies as Canadians, but it couldn't figure out exactly why.

U.S. cities and states, led by Connecticut and Minnesota are trying to restrict the use of BPA in products aimed at infants and toddlers. The chemical is also widely found in the linings of metal cans and on cash register receipts.
Code:
 
I'd be curious as to the actual effect. Are we talking about enough estrogen to cause a measurable increase in the body? Without knowing that it sounds like more media frenzy related crap.
 
I'd be curious as to the actual effect. Are we talking about enough estrogen to cause a measurable increase in the body? Without knowing that it sounds like more media frenzy related crap.


Good point bro. Thats exactly what i want to know too...These days every one has an agenda so you gotta ask yourself ...is this all a tree hugger anti plastic campaign? or is the reason you dont hear about it because of a cover up and its really bad? Or is it just starting to be blown of proportion period??

I decided to look into it a bit more after i heard someone speak about it and the above article was all i really found. I looked into it again today and found this published by Scientific American (again without being sure of the political motives they may or may not have).......Its not clear on how serious it really is either but still interesting


FDA first approved BPA as a food container in 1963 because no ill effects from its use had been shown. When Congress passed a law—the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976—mandating that the EPA conduct or review safety studies on new chemicals before giving them the nod, compounds like BPA were already on the market. Therefore, they were not subject to the new rules nor required to undergo additional testing unless specific concerns had been raised (such as in the case of PCBs). "The science that exists today supports the safety of BPA," ACC's Hentges says, based largely on research his organization has funded.

But other studies since 1976 have shown that small doses (less than one part per billion) of estrogenlike chemicals, such as BPA, may be damaging. "In fetal mouse prostate you can stimulate receptors with estradiol at about two tenths of a part per trillion, and with BPA at a thousand times higher," vom Saal says. "That's still 10 times lower than what a six-year-old has." In other words, children six years of age were found to have higher levels of BPA's by-product glucuronide in their urine than did mice dosed with the chemical that later developed cancer and other health issues.

Further complicating the issue is the stew of other estrogen-mimicking chemicals to which humans are routinely exposed, from soy to antibacterial ingredients in some soaps. The effects of such chemical mixtures are not known but scientists say they may serve to enhance the ill effects of one another. "The assumption that natural estrogens are somehow immediately good for you and these chemicals are immediately bad," Belcher says, "is probably not a reasonable assumption to make."

The chemical industry argues that unless BPA is proved to have ill effects it should continue to be manufactured and used, because it is cheap, lightweight, shatterproof and offers other features that are hard to match. "There is no alternative for either of those materials [polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins] that would simply drop in where those materials are used," Hentges says.
 
Great post.. I'm switching to fricken glass or stainless steel.. Anyone make a stainless shaker bottle or do i toss the spring in my own bottle..
 
In pharm school, they claim this is why our generation has 50% less sperm count thatn our grandfathers.
 
Back
Top