Anabolic/androgenic index question

[Santo224]

What's up guys? I have a question. When comparing the androgenic properties of two compounds using the anabolic androgenic index, how do you read it? For example, if one compound has an androgenic rating of 37 and an anobolic rating of 125, and the other compound has an androgenic rating of 91 and an anobolic rating of 1100, how do you compare it's androgenicity? Do you compare the 37 to 91 or do you compare the ratios between androgenic and anobolic rating?

So, is the second compound more androgenic because it has a rating of 91 or is it less androgenic because its anabolic rating is so many times greater than its androgenic rating? I'm just trying to compare the androgenic properties of deca and an over the counter pro-steroid, epistane. I'm curious because epistane is a DHT derivitive.
Thanks a lot for the help, replies are very appreciated.

 

[mikeswift]

interesting comparison but I'd have to see the chart you're referring to in order to help... I think both of your conclusions are accurate though because they would both work. Is Epistane on this chart already? i've been running it for a few weeks now and I haven't noticed much to be honest.

 

[Santo224]

Thanks a lot for your reply, Mike. I really appreciate it. The anabolic/androgenic index charts that I am referring to are the ones in Anabolics 2007 in the steroid profile section. Epistane has a profile, but it is under the name Havoc. I'm a little concerned with androgenic side effects because I noticed some hair thinning on my test cycle. I was considering just running epistane before I run another full cycle, what do you think is more androgenic? Thanks again, talk to you later.