drtbear1967

Musclechemistry Board Certified Member
With so much emphasis on avoiding sugar, the idea that "all sugar is bad" poses the risk of inadequately consuming essential nutrients.
.
A recent review has summarized data pertaining to the question: does intake of added or total #sugarassociate with #diet quality?
.
The literature indicates that high intakes of "added sugar", are negatively associated with vitamins and #minerals such as #thiamin, #riboflavin, #niacin, #folate, #calcium, iron, #zinc, #vitamin B6 and #B12.
.
By contrast, intake of "total sugar" is positively correlated with micronutrients, calcium and vitamin C.
.
The reasoning for this observation is that foods containing "added sugar" are usually poor sources of nutrients; likely because these items include #cake, #candy, #cookies, etc...
.
On the other hand, some foods that contain "total sugar" but not "added sugar," may be very nutrient dense; for example, #oranges, #milk, even #vegetables (i.e. pea's have 6g sugar/100g).
.
Thus, if one were to consume 30g of added sugar from various treats it is likely they are ingesting fewer micronutrients and their diets are of poorer quality; particularly compared to the same sugar intake in the form of fruits and vegetables.
.
The world health organization (WHO) distinguishes between "added sugar" and sugar derived from #fruits and vegetables; as such, sugar from fruits and vegetables do not apply to their guidelines on sugar consumption.
.
 
We still have to look at the total sugar content. Example: Orange juice has no added sugar, but we all know it's way too much sugar. This pretty much applies to all fruit juices. Just eat the fruit and you'll be golden. Now if your intent is an insulin spike (post workout) then by all means have the juice even thou fructose is not the optimum choice. I can go all day long on this topic, but that's for another day.
 
Back
Top