PDA

View Full Version : HGH vs recombinant HGH



Hurilla
04-13-2005, 12:14 PM
This may be unlikely but could a none Eruopean/North American company be producing and selling gh of HUMAN ORIGIN labelled as recombinant gh?

Also is there any way you could definately tell the difference between them? eg a company may offer "rhgh" with the following properties:

1. White solid pellet (10 or 20 mg vials). Pellet does not move and white splats at top of some vials (machine produced?)
2. Large amounts can be purchased.
3. Lasts 4 weeks or more reconstituted.

Can anyone tell me if any of the above properties (or any others you may know) are only true for rhgh and not hgh (human origin) and so can be used to tell them apart?

About 5 years ago i saw some russian gh labelled "somatotrophin" which was powdered but NOT a pellet and had a YELLOWISH colour to it. I passed this up as i thought it may be the human kind, does anyone remember this stuff and know if it was human? As if it was then there are some differences with it and rhgh.

I have posed a few questions thanks in advance for any guidance here.

Marble
04-14-2005, 12:20 AM
extracted human hgh is much more expensive and difficult to produce than rhgh, and if it dates back to pre-1990 i don't think it's going to do much of anything anyway.

Hurilla
04-14-2005, 09:03 AM
"human hgh is much more EXPENSIVE and DIFFICULT to produce than rhgh"

So Marble, if the price is very good and the company is producing alot NOW (definately not around in the 80's or 90's) then you think this indicates it will be rhgh not of human origin?

fun28hi
04-14-2005, 09:35 AM
i would agree the cost would not warrent any company to use the old method of human "donors" that is when hgh was like over 10,000 bucks a treatmeant

Irishmuscle
04-14-2005, 10:05 AM
Know a few people that have used the Russian Hgh with good results, problem is it comes in a couple of different dosages and as it is all in Russian writng it is very easy to pay for more than you get. Chinese Gh is much better in my opinion. My experience of Gh is however that it is good pre-contest for stripping the fat but is not a great size builder for the cost.

Marble
04-14-2005, 11:20 AM
i would say you've got a much better chance of it being a chunk of flour or powdered monkey testicle than hGH extracted from cadavers. that method was horrible for many reasons beyond just the CJD. :p

Hurilla
04-14-2005, 06:06 PM
Marble,
I have had plenty of experience with gh (research) and its definately good. You have deduced why i would want to be sure of its origin - CJD doesn't sound alot of fun.

I have obviously tried to research this myself and i found a quote that "HGH (HUMAN ORIGIN) was a rare commodity in the 80's" is this right??? as it would be encouraging as this rhgh is available in large supply.

It is also available in 20mg vials (60ius i think?), you seem to be well up on your research, could you find out if the human hgh is/was perhaps only available in much smaller vials eg 4ius??? As i am thinking surely it wouldn't be stable to keep reconstituted for any length of time (i am just speculating here) and so would have to be used in one go???

Thanks for staying with me on this.

Marble
04-14-2005, 09:23 PM
yes, it was very hard to produce in quantities necessary for essential treatment of dwarfism and other diseases. treatment would often have to be suspended. much more expensive.

3iu = 1mg indeed. i have no idea what doses cadaver hgh was available in, but again, it would be utterly unprofitable and difficult to do compared to bacterial breeding, and any relics would have completely degraded by now.

this is all way beyond academic. i have no idea what you've got but it's not cadaver hgh.