S
saudades
Guest
For those who don't know, IGF-RH is the shorter-acting version.
Got some of the short form the other day to test a theory as to the effectiveness of the -RH form vs -LR3. So far, I am finding that it is just as effective for localized muscle growth as the -LR3 version.
In another thread I noted that the -LR3 version may cause localized muscle growth, but because it does not get bound or deactivated quickly, it makes its way into the rest of the body and effects growth of other things you may not want growing. The -RH version seems to also cause localized muscle growth, but it gets deactivated quickly leaving you with only the local muscle growth.
This was the basis of my experiment.
As far as I can tell, I got some localized muscle growth from the -RH version which first tells me that it does work and doesn't get deactivated so quickly that it does nothing. This form was also 1/3 the cost of the -LR3 version which is always a plus. I have more on the way to continue the experiment so I will post results here.
Got some of the short form the other day to test a theory as to the effectiveness of the -RH form vs -LR3. So far, I am finding that it is just as effective for localized muscle growth as the -LR3 version.
In another thread I noted that the -LR3 version may cause localized muscle growth, but because it does not get bound or deactivated quickly, it makes its way into the rest of the body and effects growth of other things you may not want growing. The -RH version seems to also cause localized muscle growth, but it gets deactivated quickly leaving you with only the local muscle growth.
This was the basis of my experiment.
As far as I can tell, I got some localized muscle growth from the -RH version which first tells me that it does work and doesn't get deactivated so quickly that it does nothing. This form was also 1/3 the cost of the -LR3 version which is always a plus. I have more on the way to continue the experiment so I will post results here.
