PDA

View Full Version : Can Albert Pujols win the Triple Crown?



theBIGness
08-26-2010, 07:25 PM
It has been 43 years since Boston's Carl Yastrzemski won a Triple Crown. But here we are, with a little more than a month left in the regular season, and we have a real shot of it happening once again.
Only this time it could take place in the National League, where it hasn't happened since 1937 and it is not just one player who has a shot at it either, it is two. As interesting as any of the playoff races down the stretch are going to be, the race with the most intrigue may be between St. Louis' Albert Pujols and Cincinnati's Joey Votto.
Not only do both players have legitimate shots at one of the rarest feats in baseball, but both of their teams are fighting it out for a National League Central title.
Heading into action on Thursday Votto, whose Reds lead the division over the Cardinals by 3 1/2 games, leads the NL with a .326 average, seven percentage points ahead of Pujols, who tops the Senior Circuit in both home runs (33) and RBI (92).
Votto, though, is only two behind Pujols in each of the latter two categories.
Of course, either player would rather win a division title over a Triple Crown. Like the NL Central, the NL MVP race is probably a two-horse race between Votto and Pujols, with the one whose team winds up the division being named MVP.
How about this scenario, though? Say the Reds hold on and win the division, but Pujols wins a Triple Crown? Could Pujols actually win a Triple Crown and be denied a third straight MVP? And the same question applies to Votto.
It has happened before. After winning his second straight Triple Crown in 1947, Boston's Ted Williams finished second in the voting to Joe DiMaggio of the New York Yankees. Lou Gehrig actually finished fifth in the MVP voting the year of his Triple Crown in 1934.
I think Pujols has a real shot at winning this. While Votto has had a terrific season, it just feels like this is going to be yet another crowning achievement in the remarkable career of Albert Pujols. He has always just reeked of Triple Crown winner. And the funny thing is, should he win it, he will likely finish with some of the worst numbers of his remarkable career.
Votto, though, may get the last laugh with his team playing in the postseason.

(IN ORDER TO WIN TRIPLE CROWN YOU MUST LEAD THE LEAGUE IN BATTING AVERAGE, HOME RUNS, AND RBI, VERY DIFFICULT TO DO AND HASNT BEEN DONE IN A VERY LONG TIME)


Read more: Will we see a Triple Crown in the NL? - Baseball Wires - MiamiHerald.com (http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/08/26/1793428/will-we-see-a-triple-crown-in.html#ixzz0xl15daEy)

CH3NO2
08-26-2010, 10:27 PM
I think Votto will win one of the three categories. So my answer is no, he will not win the triple crown.

big in vegas
08-26-2010, 10:44 PM
He can win it, but I don't think he will. Votto will win at least one of the categories and my best guess would be he'd win the batting average. The only thing that sucks is that Pujols will be walked so much that it'll give Votto a chance to either catch or pass him or completely fuck it up since Pujols' average won't be affected by the walks

LeatherHead
08-27-2010, 12:20 PM
He can win it, but I don't think he will. Votto will win at least one of the categories and my best guess would be he'd win the batting average. The only thing that sucks is that Pujols will be walked so much that it'll give Votto a chance to either catch or pass him or completely fuck it up since Pujols' average won't be affected by the walks
Good point!

theBIGness
08-27-2010, 01:22 PM
Pujols did hit number 400hr last night but im still pulling for him to get that batting average up and take the crown. Either way hes a badass

Lightsout
08-27-2010, 08:40 PM
Pujols did hit number 400hr last night but im still pulling for him to get that batting average up and take the crown. Either way hes a badass He will go down as one of the best players to play the game if not the best !!!!:gold:

big in vegas
08-27-2010, 10:03 PM
As long as nothing comes up with him using PED's he'll be hands down the best of all time. I don't personally think he's using, but you never really know anymore. He's probably the most talented to ever play the game all in all

theBIGness
08-27-2010, 10:06 PM
i dont know what will happen when they start testing for gh but hopefully hes ok without it if he in fact is on it.

big in vegas
08-27-2010, 10:08 PM
My thoughts on all of the PED's is that they don't help you hit a baseball, period. That's a talent on it's own, not something GH or AAS is going to help. He's a talented player, hands down, if you take PED's out of the equation, he's still probably one of the best pure athletes in baseball

big in vegas
08-27-2010, 10:08 PM
And there's a reason MLB doesn't test for GH. And it's not because it's too expensive, Bud Selig is no idiot