HGH, Sub Q or IM

C

csuperman

member

• Dec 18, 2012

• #1

How's everyone taking their gh now days?

i know some people like to do it in their muscle bellies but i am not convinced it's any better than regular sub q administration.

 

Presser

Admin

Staff member

Administrator

Moderator

• Dec 18, 2012

• #2

ive done both cause i was always told subq for fatloss and IM for building muscle, was told that about igf so figured the same for HGH. but never tryed hgh too long as it hurts my hands real bad to the point i cant take the numbing feeling

 

big in vegas

MuscleChemistry Registered Member

• Dec 18, 2012

• #3

I've just done Sub Q when I've ran it

 

little guy

New member

• Dec 18, 2012

• #4

Sub q,,,

I read some love IV but not for me.

 

nuknuk

MuscleChemistry member

• Dec 19, 2012

• #5

sub q for me.

 

C

csuperman

member

• Dec 19, 2012

• #6

little guy said:

Sub q,,,

I read some love IV but not for me.

Click to expand...

i cant stand anything iv related.

 

E

Erudite

New member

• Dec 21, 2012

• #7

Presser said:

ive done both cause i was always told subq for fatloss and IM for building muscle, was told that about igf so figured the same for HGH. but never tryed hgh too long as it hurts my hands real bad to the point i cant take the numbing feeling

Click to expand...

Are these the main reasons for doing each respective procedure? Any other considerations aside from discomfort and convenience?