Do SARMs build muscle without training?

I laughed so hard when I seen this post on another forum. They of course sell SARMs. I figure they posted it for the Search Engine's

"You here a lot of guys "complaining" that "it is not fair" you build more muscle on steroids without training than a natural working out hard.
Studies have shown that as well.


Does anyone know SARMs do this as well? And to what extent?

Anyone experience taking SARMs and noticing muscle gains even without training?"

Iron-game said:

I laughed so hard when I seen this post on another forum. They of course sell SARMs. I figure they posted it for the Search Engine's

"You here a lot of guys "complaining" that "it is not fair" you build more muscle on steroids without training than a natural working out hard.
Studies have shown that as well.


Does anyone know SARMs do this as well? And to what extent?

Anyone experience taking SARMs and noticing muscle gains even without training?"

Click to expand...

I know that AAS build muscle w o training. Of course only to a degree. I <assume> the same for sarms, but SARMs build more than AAS? Sarms are great. Definitely from my experience helped me add some LBM and I have cut with them as well. But I still train and eat well. Obviously. I know guys who juiced thinking that AAS are magic and that you can fuck off most of the time, eat shitty all the time and win mr O bc AAS are magic. They ended up looking like they never lifted lmao and the gear was real. Their weight went up but still. One wasa bud of mine he was 125lbs wet lmao he used Superdrol/pstanz/test-e he was about 140 at the end, did a pct lost it all, but he didn't do anything. Lmao

SARMs work, they have their place. I bet they would be great in a cycle since you don't need to worry about the sides you see on AAS, but to say they are better... cannot see it. I have seen places market DHEA (Which is available at walmart for like $7) market it as a potent AAS gain 15 lbs in 4 weeks no side effects!!!! One bottle $75+ shipping. Poor bastards who bought into that one. At least sarms work.

I think people think SARMS since they target specific ARs are better and have more direct growth, but I don't see it. Maybe if you really bump the dosage? Think about it... Test theraputic dose is up to 250mg FDA approved. I use between 500-800mg ew. SARMs are for instance, osta, 25mg ED what if you bumped it to 100mg ED or something? Could it equal DBOK or something? Hmmm not sure, but now I am curious to see if anyone tried it.

I have seen a number of videos on SARMs. Including one by Jerry Brainum, who is supposed to have about 40 years experience in the fitness and nutrition industry. The general consensus is that they work to some extent but are nowhere as effective as AAS. These drugs are the 1st generation of SARMs and new ones are being developed. When the 2nd generation is fully tested and proven, you will see them being sold by the big pharmas because if there is money to be made they will be in on it.

By the way I never saw anything that says they work without training.

The part that got me is the "complaining" and "its not fair", lmao.

Training alone will always build more muscle than any PED use alone. Due to the compounding results.

At least I hope so!

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk