What are your thoughts on both? I hear conflicting information on both compounds. Some people say dmz is extremely dry & more suited for recomp or a cutter. While others say its a all out bulker. Some say they get extremely bad bloat with dmz. Vice versa with msten, I have no experience with msten so i can't comment on it. Dmz I tried at 40mg for 8 weeks & it blew me the fuck up with bad bloat. I even upped my potassium & water intake & it still didn't help.
dimethazine VS methylstenbolone
i never used them, but i do think we have amike arnold write up on methysten bolone ,
as far as guys on here, i read guys say they blew up on dmz, like ur saying and not got dry gains from it, and i also know methystenbolone is suppose to be less toxic but the driest between these two
but alas i have no real world experience with them brutha sorry
as far as guys on here, i read guys say they blew up on dmz, like ur saying and not got dry gains from it, and i also know methystenbolone is suppose to be less toxic but the driest between these two
but alas i have no real world experience with them brutha sorry
yellow snow
New member
Both are very diet related. Msten is considered a dry compound with a lot of strength gains. Hard on the liver. DMZ is right in the middle not to dry not wet, very diet related.
Similar threads
