Gfl??
- Thread starter thatdguy
- Start date
franconian
New member
no asking for sources****** EDITED BY PRESSER
proud13
New member
There are no copyright infringement laws on IGF. It's a cytokine not a dictionary, a CD or a DVD.
Gropep owns the patent rights and is the only producer/manufacturer of it. They selects certain companies to redistribute it around the world. If a distributor is carrying it then they have permission to be carrying it and would state IGF-1R3 not some 'GFL' acronym. Unless of course the company is UG but then why would they call it GFL instead of just IGF-1R3.
That would be like somebody illegally distributing Serostim HGH and calling it BFE. It makes no difference if they're caught they're screwed and naming it something different won't help or protect them nor does it have anything to do with copyright. Makes no sense in any way.
Gropep owns the patent rights and is the only producer/manufacturer of it. They selects certain companies to redistribute it around the world. If a distributor is carrying it then they have permission to be carrying it and would state IGF-1R3 not some 'GFL' acronym. Unless of course the company is UG but then why would they call it GFL instead of just IGF-1R3.
That would be like somebody illegally distributing Serostim HGH and calling it BFE. It makes no difference if they're caught they're screwed and naming it something different won't help or protect them nor does it have anything to do with copyright. Makes no sense in any way.
einstein1905
New member
They don't change the name for copyright purposes, but LR3 is patented. By calling it GFL, many people won't recognize it as what it is, so they can continue to sell it w/o word getting back to the Australians. It's obviously working.......look at the post title...."what is GFL?" For the people in the know, they have a "research company" that sells "GFL". Word gets around to the right people in confidence, and they have enough customers who know what it really is and can justify the risk of selling it. Gropep does control who distributes it publically, but they also sell to labs that use it for "research", who can, in turn, start "research companies".
