interesting read...

F

Flexmaster

Guest
(41)



(A) The term "anabolic steroid" means any drug or hormonal substance, chemically and pharmacologically related to testosterone (other than estrogens, progestins, and corticosteroids) that promotes muscle growth, and includes--
(i) boldenone,
(ii) chlorotestosterone,
(iii) clostebol,
(iv) dehydrochlormethyltestosterone,
(v) dihydrotestosterone,
(vi) drostanolone,
(vii) ethylestrenol,
(viii) fluoxymesterone,
(ix) formebulone,
(x) mesterolone,
(xi) methandienone,
(xii) methandranone,
(xiii) methandriol,

(xiv) methandrostenolone,
(xv) methenolone,
(xvi) methyltestosterone,
(xvii) mibolerone,
(xviii) nandrolone,
(xix) norethandrolone,
(xx) oxandrolone,
(xxi) oxymesterone,
(xxii) oxymetholone,
(xxiii) stanolone,
(xxiv) stanozolol,
(xxv) testolactone,
(xxvi) testosterone,
(xxvii) trenbolone, and
(xxviii) any salt, ester, or isomer of a drug or substance described or listed in this paragraph, if that salt, ester, or isomer promotes muscle growth.
(B)
(i) Except as provided in clause (ii), such term does not include an anabolic steroid which is expressly intended for administration through implants to cattle or other nonhuman species and which has been approved by the Secretary of Health and Human Services for such administration.
(ii) If any person prescribes, dispenses, or distributes such steroid for human use, such person shall be considered to have prescribed, dispensed, or distributed an anabolic steroid within the meaning of subparagraph (A).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------apparently the man has something wrong with building muscle because apparently that is the only criteria something needs to meet to be on this list...goodbye protien, and busting your ass in the gym!!!
 
I really don't get it. Why do they think that substances that 'promote muscle growth' are bad? There are tests that show these substances are not pharmacologically addictive, right? It just doesn't make sense. Is there nothing we can do about this (without money)? Petitions? I'm all for leaving the sports natural, but for someone who wants to build some muscle to look good, have confidence, etc., I see nothing wrong with that as long as you can do it safely.
 
i just don't get the point why not...if it's naturally produced in your body at a slow pace, what's wrong with supplementing alittle bit....
 
Back
Top