Girlfriend and Sterility

optimalbalance

New member
Hey its it safe to not use any protection when taking 150mgs of Prop every day??????????? Also about what day into cycle would I be safe?
 
If you're having sex without birth control, you have a good chance of getting her pregnant.

Gear can lower your sperm count but there's still more than enough to get a girl pregnant.
 
Well I got a girl pregnant when she was on the pill and that is supposed to be 99.9%. Always wrap it unless you want a little kid or a nice STD.
 
Thanks everyone, I always thought a guy on test was comparable to a girl on estrogen. STD's aren't a problem as we have been bareback for 5 weeks already. I'm 31 been with lots of girls unprotected and never had a pregnancy. She can't take the pill and I can't take a condom. I'll just stick to the pullin I was just wondering if I actually needed to. Thanks again!!!!!
 
Just make sure she doesn't save a wad of your boys so she can secretly pop it inside of herself later...lots of women are evil and they'll do anything to throw a collar around your neck, even when you think everything is cool.

Then again, maybe it's just me and all the bad experiences I've had....who knows
 
Thats funny. Actually I could handle my first child now at 31y.o. if it came to be. She's pretty damn cool. Sexy, built, and she's a locally noted Boxer. Feels good to know I'm safe in the bars with her. No really though she does have one hell of a hook for a 6 foot 160lb'er. Bout broke my arm one night screwing around. I better stop there with the how much a luv her,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Clomids kicking my but I think. Peace
 
200mg of test per week will give you a 98.6% chance of being sterile. It's an approved use in many countries as male birth control. It takes 4 to 6 weeks to reach that level.
For comparison, the female pill is 96.4% effective and condoms are only 79% effective.
 
Big A said:
200mg of test per week will give you a 98.6% chance of being sterile. It's an approved use in many countries as male birth control. It takes 4 to 6 weeks to reach that level.
For comparison, the female pill is 96.4% effective and condoms are only 79% effective.

So I've been pulling out and blowing on the face for no reason?

And all of those perfect little maps of Hawaii on her stomach time and time again? All for nothing!
 
Spinesplitter said:
Just make sure she doesn't save a wad of your boys so she can secretly pop it inside of herself later...lots of women are evil and they'll do anything to throw a collar around your neck, even when you think everything is cool.

Then again, maybe it's just me and all the bad experiences I've had....who knows

this wasn't you was it?

CHICAGO An appeals court said a man can press a claim for emotional distress after learning a former lover had used his sperm to have a baby. But he can't claim theft, the ruling said, because the sperm were hers to keep.

Dr. Richard O. Phillips' accuses Dr. Sharon Irons of a “calculated, profound personal betrayal'' after their affair six years ago, saying she secretly kept semen after they had oral sex, then used it to get pregnant.

He said he didn't find out about the child for nearly two years, when Irons filed a paternity lawsuit.

DNA tests confirmed Phillips was the father, the court papers state. Phillips was ordered to pay about $800 (euro603) a month in child support, said Irons' attorney, Enrico Mirabelli.

Phillips sued Irons, claiming he has had trouble sleeping and eating and has been haunted by “feelings of being trapped in a nightmare,'' court papers state.

Irons responded that her alleged actions weren't “truly extreme and outrageous'' and that Phillips' pain wasn't bad enough to merit a lawsuit. The circuit court agreed and dismissed Phillips' lawsuit in 2003.

But the higher court ruled that, if Phillips' story is true, Irons “deceitfully engaged in sexual acts, which no reasonable person would expect could result in pregnancy, to use plaintiff's sperm in an unorthodox, unanticipated manner yielding extreme consequences.''

The judges backed the lower court decision to dismiss the fraud and theft claims, agreeing with Irons that she didn't steal the sperm.

“She asserts that when plaintiff 'delivered' his sperm, it was a gift -an absolute and irrevocable transfer of title to property from a donor to a donee,'' the decision said. “There was no agreement that the original deposit would be returned upon request.''

Phillips is representing himself in the case. He could not be reached for comment Thursday.

“There's a 5-year-old child here,'' Mirabelli said. ``Imagine how a child feels when your father says he feels emotionally damaged by your birth.''
 
That's crazy about that story posted above. And these people are doctors.

Women can be wicked. There was an Law and Order SVU that was similar. But the chick made the guy pass out and electrically discharded the victum's semen by shoving a cattlepraud-esque thing in his rectum. They had to get that story from somewhere...that's all I'm saying...
 
Even if she didn't really steal his sperm, I would not award her the paternity suit against Phillips. Though she had his sperm, she obviously wanted to conceive a child without him knowing, which would indicate to me that there is first an element to deceive or otherwise possibly extort money from Phillips. Second, because she wanted to conceive on her own, she also wanted to raise the child on her own without Phillips or force him into raising the child with her by means of the paternity suit. Based on that, I would dismiss Irons case if I were the judge.
 
Back
Top