About higher dosed HGH cycles

Chris250

MuscleChemistry Registered Member
Originally Posted by MaTrlx
Have any ideas about IFBB pro's rHGH protocol 123? Do they bother(or actually know) to prevent adaptation to rHGH, considering they should be running a high dose of it. (as i assume)...


OK, now comes the frustration. This is all to classic IMO. Mega dosing w/IFBB'ers has become a matter of necessity. However NOT because it's an appropriate method, instead because they're a victim of their own doing!

It's sad, but I'm not surprised at the ignorance (not stupidity) of many regarding these issues. For instance, is anyone on this board, other than Dat or myself, discussing Desensitization or Adaptation? If so, I personally haven't seen it. I can remember talking w/Dat briefly about desensitization in PM's about 6 months ago re: GHRP-6. We talked a little about "rotation", but not much more. None the less, desensitization was nothing new to him (then), yet it seems it's new to people here (now) on these boards?!?

Dat has more studies under his belt than I do, but I also remember seeing him mention insulin resistance w/prolonged usage of synthetic GH and was just another reason why GH secretagogues held additional appeal. Now I am unsure which studies he referred to, none the less, I remember years ago this was the main concern during studies, i.e. insulin resistance w/prolonged use!

So back to the question -- "Do they bother (or actually know) to prevent adaptation to rHGH" Good question! As I said, who's talking about adaptation? Who's talking about "insulin resistance w/prolonged use??" My thoughts are (for some), as an example: Joe told Gus to use GH because it's what all the Pro's use! Gus liked the idea because not only is that true (all the pro's do use it) but he noted it had the word, "Growth" in it!!

Then there's other types who know SOME of the science behind it. Take this thread for example:
Am I Not Using GH/Slin Properly?
It received 700 VIEWS!

The man (Brother Iron) is doing everything right except for ONE thing. If he were to eliminate that one thing anyone partially human would have gained based on that regimen and WO schedule alone. But not him?!? Of course, everyone had a different opinion. Mine was - STOP the 12IU ED! His reply was from Dat's thread to which he extrapolated from it what he wanted. He replied, "Can you explain why please? Based off of DATs guide 12 IU allows for year round use but 16+ you need time off?"

Now I don't know what post he's referring to, but it's my guess Dat wasn't referring to rhGH, yet rather GH releasers/secretagogues. Further, even IF Dat was referring to rhGH, then the man needs to consider other posts that Dat has written which address other matters, such as "prolonged usage" which I know I've seen Dat's comment about (somewhere). The idea here is to combine one post with another and so on and in the end, you'll have a book with an overview of the entire subject. No matter, Brother Iron has the fix - bump to 40IU ED. Ugh!! Diabetes - here he comes!

So Gus uses GH for a while, he's told to dose as high as sides permit him to. Months later he plateau's not understanding why?? Joe tells Gus, you need to use more GH! So Gus does -- just as everyone else does. Well it works for a while and then nothing....so more GH? Why not! It again works for a while and then another plateau. By now, GH not only becomes very expensive, but requires LARGE amounts for him to grow. The man's done it to himself, never really understanding what's happened. The man's body is in the area of desensitization and virtually dose dependant for any growth whatsoever. GH antibodies, in more than sufficient numbers are swimming around waiting for the next supposed mass intrusion. Unless the man makes some changes, mega dosing is the only way he'll ever grow dosing GH.

And like others who plateau, their off to try to find the next best thing they can implement into their regimen. Problem is, WHY DOESN'T ANYONE TRY TO FIGURE OUT WHY THEY'VE PEAKED?? Did the GH go bad? Doubtful. Did they change up their diet? WO schedule? Probably not! If nothings changed, then what the hell has??? I too peaked and couldn't figure out what was going on! I even began to experience a reversal. Now figure this -- if I KNEW much of what I'm trying to convey here and was still stumped then, is it too far fetched to believe others (who probably don't know ALL they should) are stumped as well, not knowing proper methods to counter these issues?

Again, with the exception of Dat, I'm the only guy here saying, with continued usage you MUST:
Mix it up.
Change up - Rotation (different from mix it up).
Confuse the body.
Shock is necessary w/Mega dosing.
Clear and Prime.

The people who follow the above, will grow far faster than those who don't!

In fact, if I had my way and readers here had numerous substances for growth, I'd personally say, change up your regimen entirely every 3 weeks or somethnig to this effect! That means, if you use GH releasers/secretagogues, use them for approx 3 weeks. Then change up to something else, say rhGH for approx 3 weeks. Then try mixing them up together for 3 weeks. If you can, include IGF-1, MGF, Test and even Slin (if you're OK and careful w/it) in the mix or used entirely on an OFF week. MIX IT UP, CHANGE UP and CONFUSE! Dose low at the beginning w/an increase towards the end, but NOT mega dosing! Hopeully you get the idea - this would keep your body guessing and freshly primed!

I could give stories, but this has already been too long and I HATE writing! I'm out to help.

Remember one thing - newly introduced substances yield the best results at the beginning of any administration. That's because the body is empty and primed, w/no adaptation set in (yet). Changing up every 3 weeks allows for clearing and priming from one substance to another, i.e. Rotation!

Bottom line - BB'ers do it to themselves. Mega Dosing is not *required* for substantial growth unless they've desensitized themselves enough that it is.
 
Very good post. I'd add to that my theory that the same is true with using IGF-1.
 
Makes perfect sense to me. Your body adapts to anything you add to it. I know if you use t-3 you will become dependent on it. If you stay on test you will have to inject it. You will eventually adapt and then you wont respond like you did. It kind of makes me wonder about say alternating anabolics with test. I mean I wonder how it would work if you ran a 20 weeker with say primo the first 4, deca timed where it kicks in about when the primo drops or a slight overlap, then maybe tren, and then maybe eq, with var at the end or winnie. You see what I mean. Just a thought.
 
That's similar to what Paul Borreson advocated doing because he said that all anabolics will compete for the same receptors and the gear will just go to waste if you use them at the same time.
 
Back
Top