Bonds blames aas for injuries

theBIGness

MuscleChemistry Registered Member
SAN FRANCISCO (AP)—Barry Bonds’ former mistress testified Monday that the slugger blamed a 1999 elbow injury on steroid use.
Called by federal prosecutors to the witness stand in Bonds’ perjury trial, Kimberly Bell said that she asked Bonds about the problem with his left elbow, which she described as “a big lump … it looked awful.”
She testified that Bonds responded by saying his steroid use caused the injury, because the muscle and tendons grew too fast for the joint to handle.



<noscript>
b
</noscript>

“It blew out,” she said.
She also said that Bonds talked about the widespread use of steroids among baseball players, including his suspicion that Mark McGwire was juicing during his assault on the single-season home run record in 1998—a mark that Bonds later broke.
“He mentioned that other players do it and that’s how they got ahead, that’s how they achieved,” Bell testified.
Bonds is accused of four counts of making false statements and one of obstruction for telling a federal grand jury in 2003 that he never knowingly took performance-enhancing drugs. Dressed in a dark blue suit, Bonds alternately watched Bell on the stand, scribbled notes and whispered to one of his defense attorneys, Allen Ruby, as she testified.



Bell said she and Bonds met on July 3, 1994, and attended a barbecue that day. From there, they shared a nine-year romantic relationship that continued even after Bonds married another woman in 1999.
She further testified that Bonds’ sexual performance declined in the later years of their relationship. She said that his testicles changed shape and shrank. Bell also testified that Bonds grew—and shaved—chest hair and developed acne on his back.
A visibly uncomfortable Bell testified that Bonds’ behavior also changed in the later years of their relationship.
“He was increasingly aggressive, irritable, agitated and very impatient,” said Bell, dressed conservatively in a gray jacket and white shirt.
She choked up as she testified that Bonds verbally abused her starting in 1999, threatening “to cut my head off and leave me in a ditch.” Bell alleged that Bonds threatened that “he would cut out my breast implants because he paid for them.”
Prosecutors allege that the physical and mental changes Bell told the jury about during the last four years of their relationship are side effects of steroids use.
This was the period when Bonds noticeably bulked up and started posting unprecedented power numbers for the San Francisco Giants. The seven-time NL MVP hit a season-record 73 homers in 2001 en route to a career record 762 by the time of his last season in 2007—months before he was indicted for his grand jury testimony.
 
This country is going to Hell In A Hand Basket! When hearsay Testimony, on the size of your fucking nuts,temper, and the fact that you start shaving ur chest can convict a man who hasnt been caught doing shit then their is something way way way wrong with this country!

Its fucking hearsay! Any prosecutor can grab you or me off the street and try convicting us on hearsay and the sad part about it is they can and will make a great case against you every fucking time. They could make Mother Theresa Look like a fucking child rapist if they offered enough shit heads deals to say this or that and shed a light this way or that way with their testimony.

I commend Roger Clemens for standing up to the system and the perjury charges, even though I know they are going to fucking hang him. But I commend him for taking the "Fuck you if you didnt see me put the needle in my ass, then fuck off" Approach! Roger is dealing with the same "He Said She Said" bullshit and he will get convicted of perjury even though not one person has a single solid shred of evidence that he did steroids other then hearsay!

They are clogging our courtrooms up and spending millions of tax dollars going after these athletes, when in reality nobody fucking cares! Thats our government! Let the NFL and MLB and NBA take care of their own and stop holding Congressional hearings on FUCKING STEROIDS IN SPORTS!

Steroids arent ruining our country, Prescription Medications are, Painkillers to be more precise!

I see steroid related storys on television EVERY FUCKING DAY!

You know what i dont see, or havent heard, I havent heard the word Heroin, or Cocain come from the mouth of any of our supposed REAL SERIOUS Journalists! I haven't heard Katie Couric, John Stossel, Brian Williams,Charles Gibson,Dan Rather or any of the so called serious journalists Make one mention of Heroin, Cocain, and/or Meth Ruining our Counrty from the inside out, But I have heard each of them say the word "Steroids" COUNTLESS TIMES ON PRIME TIME TELEVISION, Nearly Everyday one of those mentioned speaks about steroids! Thats down right SAD!

Lets Hold Congressional Hearings On Steroids Rather then Have hearings on why Big Business is Leaving this country so they dont have to pay 35% taxes hear when they can leave the USA and Pay an average of 20% taxes in another country and some as low as single digit Taxation! Creating an extra 100,000 new jobs hear in the USA by lowering BIG BIZ Taxes and having them come back or stay here is far far far less Important then Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens doing STEROIDS, OOOOOH The Big "S" Word!

I sure wish I owned my own Media Outlet! If I did it would be Open Season on these Journalists and Politicians.
 
Yea, this whole trial is just getting ridiculous. I'm already sick of it, he's lying, they're full of shit and it's just a soap opera
 
hearsay and nothing more......he has good attorney's......maybe they can stretch it out til the world ends next december 21
 
As the first week of the Barry Bonds perjury trial comes to an end, increasing number of newspaper columnists have started criticizing the government for its witch-hunt of Bonds. The pursuit of Barry Bonds is not only a colossal waste of taxpayer funds but also fundamentally misguided in its pursuit of so-called justice.
Sally Jenkins, of the Washington Post, is one of the few journalists who has consistently been critical of the steroid hysteria that has permeated American culture over the past decade. She has been an outspoken critique of the government’s witch-hunt and its pursuit of celebrity athletes. Jenkins recently penned an article that not only condemned the prosecution of Barry Bonds but also the “overcriminalization” of steroid laws.
Jenkins begins by suggesting that criminal law should be reserved for serious crimes not offenses like the personal use of anabolic steroids. “Overcriminalizing” such minor offenses makes a mockery of justice. She is highly critical of a government that abuses criminal law simply to make an example out of someone. She believes this is exactly what the government is doing when it comes to Barry Bonds. Furthermore, she questions the role of the federal government in ensuring fair play in sports. Finally, she condemns the Anabolic Steroid Control Acts of 1990 and 2004 as a prime example of a law that “overcriminalizes” trivial acts like steroid use that could be more effectively handled with civil or administrative penalties rather than time in prison.
The government’s role in ”cleaning up steroids” should be limited to how it handles any other controlled substance.Thus Bonds should be treated like anyone else who uses steroids without a prescription. From a criminal standpoint, how was his act any worse than some guy at the neighborhood Gold’s Gym using to look big on the beach?
The only difference is in what he achieved while using them, but the government has no business getting involved in ensuring fair competition. If it starts trying, will federal reviews of referees and umpires be next?
Lately we punish all sorts of relatively trivial acts as crimes, with nearly 4,500 criminal laws on the books. A good deal of them are fairly recent, including the Anabolic Steroid Acts of 1990 and 2004. Reformers such as Dick Thornburgh, the former U.S. Attorney General, suggests countless offenses could be handled more effectively with civil, regulatory, or administrative penalties such as fines, or other sanctions short of criminal.
 
Barrys big ass head is on trial too........


Federal prosecutors called Larry Bowers as their expert witness to testify on the side effects of anabolic steroids and human growth hormone during the first week of the Barry Bonds perjury trial. Barry Bonds is on trial for lying under oath about knowingly using performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) such as anabolic steroids and human growth hormone.

Larry Bowers is the Chief Science Officer of the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA); he is an expert in analytical chemistry and drug testing. Although Bowers is not a medical doctor and has never seen a patient nor treated a single patient with steroid-related side effects, he was chosen as the prosecution’s authority on medical side effects related to PEDs.

Bowers testified that the side effects of recombinant human growth hormone include enlarged head, hands and feet. The defense sought to have the evidence excluded based on the limited scientific evidence supporting the existence of such side effects. Judge Susan Illston ruled that the testimony was admissible.

Some writers celebrated that judge’s decision to allow the evidence but not necessarily because of its relevance to the Bonds perjury trial.

Gwen Knapp of the San Francisco Chronicle applauded the decision because it legitimized scientifically-questionable side effects that she felt could be useful in deterring other athletes from using PEDs.

Judge Susan Illston shut down the defense’s attempt to exclude evidence that artificial human growth hormone can lead to enlarged heads, hands and feet. She left a fairly powerful tool in the prosecution’s hands, but more importantly, she took an opportunity away from people who push performance-enhancing drugs.

If she had gone the other way, sleazy coaches or trainers could have pointed to the decision and said: “Growth hormone isn’t dangerous. The judge in Barry Bonds’ trial threw out all the research because she knew the studies were unreliable.”

The desire to demonize PEDs in order to deter athletes from using the substances is more often influenced by a moral agenda rather than a scientific agenda. Teaching athletes about the true side effects of drugs should be guided by science not morality.

“Anti-steroid education” programs are not really education programs at all. A legitimate education programs strives to provide factual, scientific, evidence-based information about performance-enhancing drugs; it is neither “anti-steroid” nor “pro-steroid” but pro-truth. An “anti-steroid” program by its very nature is guided by a (moral) agenda that steroids are bad; this has a natural tendency to demonize steroids with the use of scare tactics.

We should demand accurate and truthful information about PEDs rather than cling to tenuous side effects in the hope that athletes are scared away from using PEDs.
 
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qMB92geC2Qw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
The more I hear him say, the more I think he's really believing this shit. I truly think he believes that we (the public) are stupid enough to believe the shit he is saying or at the very least to believe that we think he's stupid enough to truly think these things
 
ever notice that WHILE they are breaking records and putting asses in the seats making a lot of people money that no one fucks with them...

but after, that's when all the shit hits the fan and all bullshit comes out
 
Back
Top