Another Cruising question

PUMPED

New member
Other then "fear of loosing gains" What is the benefit of Cruising or should I say never coming off gear. We have over 33k members so please share your thoughts.
 
It's hard to maintain your size at a natty level especially when your above your genetic predisposed size. So yes cruising will help reduce this quite a bit. That's the only reason I would cruise. You do have those freaks like Kevin levrone who could take off six months and "grow" into a competition but those are far in between


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
It makes it easy not to mess with PCT. In addition I would say if I still had naturally high test levels I would cycle off and on. Now its HRT.
 
Last edited:
IF you got low T levels off gear, then cruising is the best thing bro. I can feel an extreme difference between on and off. My T levels off are like an old man's......like probably even worse than old man Presser's
 
It's hard to maintain your size at a natty level especially when your above your genetic predisposed size. So yes cruising will help reduce this quite a bit. That's the only reason I would cruise. You do have those freaks like Kevin levrone who could take off six months and "grow" into a competition but those are far in between


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Maybe Levrone can do things like this because he comes off after a show for that long. Maybe its because his body and mind are recovered. Once starting back its like starting a cycle for the 1st time again? I 100% agree with this.
 
Maybe Levrone can do things like this because he comes off after a show for that long. Maybe its because his body and mind are recovered. Once starting back its like starting a cycle for the 1st time again? I 100% agree with this.

I think this depends on the individual mentally. Can you handle shrinking up in between cycles as most would, only the genetic freaks like Levrone maintain that size while off most lose a fair amount of what they gained on a cycle
 
Blasting and cruising is the best way to go if you are looking at the short term. When you get into your 60's and 70's, would it have been better for your overall health to take time off...................using common sence I would say yes coming off is a wise choice.

The problem is who is there 20 and even early 30 gives a shit about their health when they are 65 have a grandkids and want to enjoy retirement.

Food for thought
 
Bodybuilding is all about consistency. All that starting and stopping has to be hell on the tendons and stuff with the sudden strength gains and then the tendons not being able to heal as effectively when you come off. Slow steady and consistent is the name of the game for me. I mean we are consistent with our diet, training, and sleep, but many think it's better to cycle hormones?
 
Tendons aren't effected at all during a cycle. In fact on who hasn't really weight lifted much in their life and then runs a cycle can tear tendons very easily. This is because aas increase strength and size in muscle tissue but not in ligaments/ connective tissue. So in that sense cycling may actually help keep tendons healthy. But, with that said anyone who's at the top level is also running hgh/igf which increases strength and healing in ligaments/ connective tissue. This is truly why we don't see so many injuries in the bb world and when we do the guys are usually back in record time


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I read several studies on the effects of AAS on tendons when looking into using NPP or Deca to try to help me recover from tendonitis. One of the things I read, and I'll never be able to find the study again to substantiate this, is that up to about 200 mg of test, tendons receive a beneficial effect. They recover from injuries faster than without the exogenous test. BUT, above that level, there is a NEGATIVE impact on tendons. So while you're blasting away at 500 mg a week or more, your muscles are getting stronger but your tendons are actually getting weaker. So this is a very good reason to cycle off, or at least back it way down to TRT level doses, even under 200 mg/week.

Specific to Nandrolone, whether NPP or Deca, what I read about that is that while there is an accelerated rate of recovery of tendons when using nandrolone, the fiber structure is not the same as without. Tendons' fibers are apparently "cross linked", I think the term was, and the new tendon fibers that grew while using Nandrolone had LESS of this cross linking. So while the injured tendons indeed did heal faster with Nandrolone use, the end result was a weaker tendon than if it were allowed to heal naturally.

Apparently, the reason everyone believes Nandrolone is good for the joints is because of the tendency of the joints to retain fluid in them, creating a cushioning effect. So the joints feel great (supposedly; I've never tried Nandrolone, too scared of Deca Dick...). But it's not really helping the connective tissue like I thought it would.

Now, with all that said, I have low test naturally, so I'm on a permanent cruise. But I generally keep it under 200 mg a week. I get pretty disagreeable sides if I go any higher, anyway.
 
AAS have a tremendous impact on ligaments and tendons... and there are also alot of injuries at every level of the sport they just hide them. Deca specifically probably has more positive impact on tendons than anything else and Winstrol actually interferes with the proper creation of tendons and connective tussue causing rapid growth with reduced elasticity.
 
For me I'm looking in to cruzing in the next couple years.I still come back over 500-560 ng so not in a hurt but at the end of every cycle I always get achy feet and forearms.I'm gone a start using igf 1 L3 And see if that helps so for me my tendons tend to need a break as well.
 
Muscles vs Tendons
While injecting test increases protein synthesis by roughly 50 times, depending on dose and time, most bodybuilders forget that it will reduce collagen synthesis by more than 50% -- more like 80%, giving you the collagen synthesis rate of a senior citizen. Since collagen makes up tendons, bros are very prone to injury if they continue to lift very heavy, unless they cycle off T and let their collagen synthesis get back to normal. It's like having the skeletal muscle of a gorilla with the tendons of a very old man.

Winstrol increases collagen synthesis. It will give you bigger tendons. However, your body compensates for this by making them more brittle, weaker, and more prone to injury. I can't tell you how many bros work out anaerobically and become injured while on Winstrol. Guys who lift in the 1-5 rep range while on Winstrol, to baseball players who sprint all out from a stationary position -- Winstrol should be the LAST drug they choose. Most of them like Winstrol because they don't get the weight gain from it but it is very detrimental to bros who train for any sport anaerobically. Tendons tear easily on it.

Also, the drugs I mention increase collagen synthesis while also increasing collagen cross-linking integrity, making for a much stronger tendon.

Winstrol, on the other hand, will dramatically increase collagen synthesis, but ironically it decreases collagen cross-linking integrity, thus making a much weaker tendon.

You can plan a cycle of AAS which will increase collagen synthesis and skeletal muscle growth at the same time. The key is the drug(s) you choose.

Deca, Equipoise, Anavar, and Primobolan will ALL increase skeletal muscle while at the same time dramatically increase collagen synthesis and bone mass and density, leaving you with a substantially reduced chance of becoming injured than if you choose to use AAS like sus, cyp, or enth.

While testosterone will increase bone mass and density, even at supra-physiological levels, the result is weaker tendons due to inhibition of collagen synthesis.

To plan a cycle where the goal is to increase skeletal muscle mass/strength while at the same time increase joint/tendon/ligament strength, enough to keep up with the dramatic increase in skeletal muscle, you must choose drugs like Eq, Deca, Anavar, or Primo as the base of your cycle. Testosterone and its esters can be added to your cycle to keep levels within a 'normal' physiological range (ie, 100-200 mg/wk) but must not go above this. Since drugs like eq, deca, anavar and primo will reduce endogenous, natural levels of test, these levels may be maintained with exogenous test in the 100-200 mg/wk range. Test at this dose will not inhibit collagen synthesis, but paradoxically, will help increase it. It is when exogenous testosterone is used > 200 mg/wk that collagen synthesis is inhibited.

Deca @ 3 mg/kg a week(about 270 mg/wk for a 200 lb male) will increase procollagen III levels by 270% by week 2. Procollagen III is a primary indicator used to determine the rate of collagen syn. As you can see, Deca is a very good drug at giving you everything you want -- an increase in collagen synthesis, an increase in skeletal muscle, and increases in bone mass and density. The one thing it does not give you is wood.

Primobolan, @ 5 mg/kg, will increase collagen synthesis by roughly 180% -- less than deca and equipoise but still substantial.

Equipoise @ 3 mg/kg will increase procollagen III by approximately 340% -- slightly better than deca.

Oxandrolone has over a hundred studies documenting its effectiveness at treating patients needing rapid increases in collagen synthesis to enhance healing.

These drugs have longer half-lives than most other AAS, so this should be considered when timing your post cycle Clomid use. Here they are:

Deca: 15 days Equipoise: 14 days Primobolan: 10.5 days

Anavar has a half-life of only 8 hours so it should not pose a problem.

GH is probably the most remarkable drug at increasing collagen synthesis. It increases collagen synthesis in a dose dependant manner -- the more you use, the more you will increase collagen syn. It has also demonstrated this ability in short and long term studies. From what I've read, hGH at 6 iu/day increased the collagen deposition rate by around 250% in damaged collagen structures. This result indicates that the increased biomechanical strength of wounds to collagen structures treated with biosynthetic human growth hormone was produced by an increased deposition of collagen in the collagen structures.

Eq, primo, anavar, and deca are all good -- they increase several biomakers of collagen synthesis -- ie, type III, II, I, procollagen markers. GH just seems to do so most dramatically.

Use of any of these drugs @ supra-physiological levels with a maintenance dose of test will increase collagen syn while at the same time increase skeletal muscle mass. Skeletal muscle mass gains will not be as dramatic as with large testosterone doses but you have to weigh the risk/reward basis for yourself. Also, these drugs do not satisfy the libido like testosterone, but that is not the point of this thread. It is only to demonstrate that you can increase skeletal muscle and collagen synthesis at the same time with certain AAS -- the decision is up to you.​
Man u should start a new thread with that info!!!!
 
For the record, I didn't write the article, but it's very good, none the less. lol. I'd give credit but i'm not sure who did write it so i'm just copying and pasting it from my home board. I do believe it is very accurate though, do to using these compounds myself. I'm a competitive powerlifter so i'm always dealing with some tendon bullshit so its an important topic to me. Sorry this isn't actually what the original post is about but it started getting discussed in the thread.

I prefer to cruise because i'd wrather not constantly be throwing my hormones for a rollercoaster ride, and I always want to have to use cancer drugs as little as possible.
I think coming down to a cruise dose still gives the body a good break. It's just basically mimicking levels of natural production on the high end, anyway. There are a lot of people who are treating for trt for a long time that have never had any problems. If you're responsible I honestly feel like it's probably better for your body then coming off and on. That's just my opinion though. In the whole spectrum of things, there are people that have been using AAS for a very long time, and in relation the amount of ailments that have been caused by use is very low in comparison to other things people do in life. For the most part I belive it's very safe unless you specifically go out of your way to make it unsafe.

- - - Updated - - -

Man u should start a new thread with that info!!!!

Sorry dude. It was sort of brought up and I didn't quite agree with some of the info so I just through that out there.
 
A lot of great Theories regarding cycling off vs cruising. I still challenge how cruising (staying on at low MGs) cycle vs Coming off, resting your body, soul,being normal for a few weeks and not training like your on cycle is better then cruising?
 
Hi to all from relative newb...

Im 58 and have just been cleared by my quack for sustanon 250 (actually omnadren seeing as i'm living in Ukraine)....so that's TRT for the rest of my life....

during which time i will also blast because it would seem there is hardly any downside....hurah... finally a plus side to being an old fart
 
Back
Top