kossdeh said:The big advantage I read about it was the minimal or no effect it has on the body's natural test production. I dont think that even primo could beat that.
46and2aheadofme said:
IMO bridging is just a crutch for those who can't come off. The best idea for your health is to come completely off for as long as you can, at least 8-12 weeks. I've used anavar @ 40mg/day and dbol @ 10-15mg/day to bridge and found that the gains from the cycles after the bridge were not impressive.
.
46and2aheadofme said:
This is a myth. We had a discussion about this a while back and a study was posted that showed anavar, even at 10mg/day, substantially supressed the HPTA. IMO bridging is just a crutch for those who can't come off. The best idea for your health is to come completely off for as long as you can, at least 8-12 weeks. I've used anavar @ 40mg/day and dbol @ 10-15mg/day to bridge and found that the gains from the cycles after the bridge were not impressive. Bridging, to me, is a sign of addiction. From now on I will always come completely off for at least 12 weeks between cycles.
I know many will disagree, but thought I would state my opinion anyway.
highside said:Are there any studies that say that. I would like to learn more about this. I dont see the use of using anavar at its high price if it shuts you down. Everything I have ever seen says it does not. If you know of any studies, could you post them.
Kevan said:I'd use dbol, cheaper and get good results from it, only takes 10mg every morning






