This person pm'd me. It is for Details magazine. The thing that concerns me is that you never know if the writer will write a completely non-biased article. For all I know, this person could be writing up on the "dangers of syntherol" because it is being "used as an alternative to steroids to get big with disastrous results." Even if it is anonymous, I want to know how the information is going to be used before I say anything. Too many in the media assume a lot about the people who use AAS/syntherol, and like the word "assume," make an 'ass' out of 'u' and 'me.' If this person can assure me that the article will be non-biased, then perhaps I will consider sharing.
However, you can be sure that if I catch quotes from me on this site in that magazine without my permission, that there will be consequences.