fstr03svtcobra
New member
This is a post from Mike Arnold on another forum that I thought was very interesting and I agree with. Tell me what you guys think. I think Mike is registered here so if I'm not mistaken.
"If someone is consistently gaining new muscle each cycle, regardless of whether they are running full length or pulsing cycles, how can anyone say they aren't effective? They can't. For guys who are only going to use legal products, which means no injectables, I don't think it matters much whether you run 1, 2, 3, or 4 weeks cycles of these products. The amount of muscle you gain is determined more by your total on-time over a given period of time. For example, if one guy does 1 week pulsing cycles of one week on/1 week off...and another guy does 30 day cycles, but only once every 3 months, the 1 week pulsing cycles will provide greater growth potential over a year period simply because the user will be exposing his body to the anabolic effects of the drugs for 6 months vs. only 4 months."
"If someone is consistently gaining new muscle each cycle, regardless of whether they are running full length or pulsing cycles, how can anyone say they aren't effective? They can't. For guys who are only going to use legal products, which means no injectables, I don't think it matters much whether you run 1, 2, 3, or 4 weeks cycles of these products. The amount of muscle you gain is determined more by your total on-time over a given period of time. For example, if one guy does 1 week pulsing cycles of one week on/1 week off...and another guy does 30 day cycles, but only once every 3 months, the 1 week pulsing cycles will provide greater growth potential over a year period simply because the user will be exposing his body to the anabolic effects of the drugs for 6 months vs. only 4 months."







