Media BS

napsgearhttps://ugloz.is/ domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsYOURMUSCLESHOPUGFREAK
What a crock of shit!!This is just another example of bias studies!It's like anything else you reasearch if you go looking for something negative you will find it!Funny how you never see any of the studies that show the positive aspects of gear!!!And there are plenty of them!!!
 
If they write it, it must be true. I've been preoccupied with commiting fraud
latley - now I know why - thanks for clearing that up bro.
the sad part is people believe the shit they read no matter how stupid it is!!
 
I know man that's a buch of garbage!I gotta go now I'm late for holding up my local liquor store so I can get some D-Bol!!!Wish me luck!!LMAO!!!
 
sandiego said:
How stupid are the conclusions to this study???




according to background information in the study.



Both groups had similar levels of convictions for violent crimes, sexual offenses or property crimes, such as theft and receiving stolen goods, the researchers found."


wonder what "background information" means? They didn't explain that. :rolleyes:

at least if its bullshit, its somewhat better than all the other bullshit out there. At least it says that AAS doesnt affect the instances of violent/sexual crimes.
 
well no shit the AAS positive subjects are more likely to have all the above histories. There were only 241 subjects on AAs and 1200 that were not on AAS. if my math skills are correct thats nearly 6 times the amount of non-users than AAS users.

Thats like testing 60 gay men for AIDS and 10 straight men for aids. What do you think the results will be there.

How do you think this study would get reviewed by liberal media and researches.....If the researchers would have used the same methodology for the AAS study anywhere else....they'd be out of their jobs
 
Back
Top