ok guys, be honest...

[dreww]

well i see nuks opinion as agreeable, but maybe for another reason. i mean, would you 'count off' for a guy with a prostetic leg? despite him smashing the competition? i dunno.

 

[little big guy]

yes he should have still won.

Agreed.

 

[MrPerfect]

well i see nuks opinion as agreeable, but maybe for another reason. i mean, would you 'count off' for a guy with a prostetic leg? despite him smashing the competition? i dunno.

ok drew , well put


but the difference between that and gyno is the guy could have prevented it... im not trying to count the guy off... nor am i disregarding his hardwork put forth to achieve that conditioning.

i just hope the judging had a word with him after the win:thumbsup:

 

[dreww]

could he have prevented it jon? we dont know for sure. maybe he was a fat kid and had it since puberty. maybe he did it with gear.

 

[Get_Swole]

I can see drewws point i have a little gyno just form going through puberty and a buddy of mine had never ran gear till about a year ago and he had bad gyno and he had never been above 12% bodyfat. I think i would still have to count off though just because its a flaw. Yes i would count off for not having a leg too wouldnt you? He would have to be in a special class for that? Maybe im just an ass. Like say i have a ruptured long head biceps where its torn theres a 50% chance it will rupture again if repaired so right now its not an option. If i decided to step on stage a year from now and came in with great conditioning they would still take points off for my right arm symetry being off. So why wouldnt they take off for his chest looking like he has titties?