Buffalo
MuscleChemistry Member
They are only legal with a Search Warrant or in a case such as this where the protection of life / commission of a Forcible Felony takes precedence.
Exigent circumstances
They are only legal with a Search Warrant or in a case such as this where the protection of life / commission of a Forcible Felony takes precedence.
I'm on the opposite spectrum...being that the LAPD falsely shot 2 people and have acted criminally in several ways in this case..if the laws of our Country are to be respected, first and foremost they need to be done so by law enforcement..
If this man was guilty then he needs to be punished accordingly...however I agree with the Innocent until proven guilty theory that is no longer followed in this Country and it is very dangerous IMO.
saw this quote and although I didn't write it, I agree with it..
If the police can burn suspects alive, which is murder, then the law is reduced to nothing more than words on a page, and police officers are nothing more than thugs and criminals themselves. And if journalists, reporters and editors, don’t have the guts to go against their corporate ownership to investigate and report the truth, then our society is surely doomed.
He shot at them Bro. He actively tried to kill them. I'm all for Revolt and anti Government shit, but come on. This guy wasn't sitting on his couch in his underwear watching television. He was actively involved in attempted murder on a LEO and had already killed what 3?! He has been identified by the Ofc that lived. What exactly were they supposed to do? Would you be cool with him having a shoot out with Police if he was your next door neighbor? Would you be cool with Police saying "ah well, he's pretty well buttoned up in there. Pack it in boys, maybe we'll catch him another time".
Seriously guys...
Not at all, if they were being shot at, they had two options shoot back..(I'm sure they had a sniper) or non-lethal tear gas and send SWAT in as they always do...Tear gas being extremely effective, an extraction would have been realistic...
No one believes life in prison is justice, especially someone who murdered police, you knew and I knew they would "kill him accidentally"...but it doesn't make it right...
If they weren't trying to hide, then fuck it, and send a missle from the drone right on in...problem solved..but it had to be politically correct and covered up. Murder is murder IMO....We do it in war too..a "necessary evil" according to our leaders, but doesn't make it right...
Not at all, if they were being shot at, they had two options shoot back..(I'm sure they had a sniper) or non-lethal tear gas and send SWAT in as they always do...Tear gas being extremely effective, an extraction would have been realistic...
No one believes life in prison is justice, especially someone who murdered police, you knew and I knew they would "kill him accidentally"...but it doesn't make it right...
If they weren't trying to hide, then fuck it, and send a missle from the drone right on in...problem solved..but it had to be politically correct and covered up. Murder is murder IMO....We do it in war too..a "necessary evil" according to our leaders, but doesn't make it right...
My understanding was that he was engaged in an all out gun battle. In that case Deadly Force is justified regardless of the fashion said force is applied. As long as the application of force doesn't endanger other citizens or property, it is legal.
Deadly force justified, but you discredit your own opinion with this sentence. They did destroy private property in order to kill him. The police out there also shot two asian women and destroyed their truck because it looked like his. IMO the police were out of control in trying to contain him. They found they guy through good police work, just like the police found the kidnapper in Alabama that barricaded himself in his bunker. The police in Alabama took the right course of action, not the police in California. They didnt wait him out, they didnt try to negotiate a surrender. They decided to burn someone else's house down and kill him in the process.
I personally believe that a very high percentage of Cops take part in criminal activities and are more prone to have criminal tendencies then the average person...
Christopher Dorner Manhunt: Police reportedly shoot two people in hunt for suspected killer ex-cop - Crimesider - CBS News
You are totally wrong about this, its a small percentage that are involved in criminal behavior. The Job is tough dealing with peoples problems, they hardly make enough, a mere 100k for bullshit they have to deal with. For you to make a blanket statement like that is completely wrong.
You are totally wrong about this, its a small percentage that are involved in criminal behavior. The Job is tough dealing with peoples problems, they hardly make enough, a mere 100k for bullshit they have to deal with. For you to make a blanket statement like that is completely wrong.
I would say only a small percentage are "caught" that are involved in criminal behavior...
Psychologically we can see that Type A personalities tend to draw in police officers. Confidence, aggression, impulsivity, risk taking behaviors (even in order to save others lives) and a host of other behaviors that are common in police officers are common in criminal behaviors according to criminologists. Then you tie in means, motive and opportunity. Police are often forced to be in positions where they have the means and opportunity. This is not to say that there are not excellent Officers, because there are amazing one's with many good qualities.
Criminal behavior can be something as simple as lying in order to obtain a statement from someone, planting evidence, breaking laws in order for the good of society aka the Dirty Harry syndrome, using excessive force, entrapment, among others.
The job is extremely difficult from what I understand. I know it is high stress, dangerous, causes marital problems and suicide, and to top it off, alot of people dislike Police, that must be frustrating especially if you are one of the good ones.
It is possible I worded what I mean to say wrong..but in no way do I believe that making any statement opinion or not by anyone here is wrong. We are all adults and we all have opinions...whether you agree or not, that is up to you, and I appreciate your reply. However, I'm personally curious why you think my blanket statement is 'wrong" what happened to freedom of speech?
This forum more then ever lately has a huge emphasis on protecting LE, so my intuition tells me that there are our fair share of people here from LE...Which is fine, a ton of LE uses AAS, and they have always been into weight-training, and on lifting forums, am I allowed to say that? :lurk:
My brother is LE. Some of my best friends are LE. Some of my best friends want to be LE. The person I dislike most in this world is LE.
I have several very good friends who are LE, I also have family who used to be LE, and I have dated 2 women in the last 3 years who were LE (we didn't have so much in common except sex)...not one of them considered my past AAS use a "criminal action", and that is why I get along with them. However with that being said and done, I don't always agree with their views on things, so be it, alot of people who aren't LE don't agree with mine...
I have nothing against anyone here who is...I actually respect LE..most of them... Many of them workout at my gym...There are those who go to the gym and forums to investigate, to those who do, I feel they are wasting tax payer dollars and an insult to the one's who actually "protect and serve". I don't care what anyone says, or what some BS law in a book says, AAS use is not and should not be considered a crime.






