How may mgs will honestly fit in 1 ml

napsgearhttps://ugloz.is/ domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsYOURMUSCLESHOPUGFREAK

thudgens96

hiatus
Good morning fellas. I have always been told that 328 mgs is all the test that will fit in 1 ml. Now I am no chemist and by no means am I saying this info is correct just looking for some clarity

Sent from my SM-S820L using Tapatalk
 
I dont see how that statement could be true without it listing the exact type of carrier oil for the testosterone, as their may be an oil out there that maxes out at 328mg per ml

but i dont think that statement holds true for every type of carrier oil out there, then you have to take into account benzly and benzoate content ratios, so i dont think its a universal statement bro
 
Thanks for the info like I said I'm no chemist. Often wondered if one oil was different from another. Very eager to learn wish I had found this site 5 years ago. Lol

Sent from my SM-S820L using Tapatalk
 
Thanks for the info like I said I'm no chemist. Often wondered if one oil was different from another. Very eager to learn wish I had found this site 5 years ago. Lol

Sent from my SM-S820L using Tapatalk

yeah i think it matters, but like you im no chemist either lol, and i have only made a handful of things mostly fina from pellets back in the day so i really dont know my way around making gear, and such but i do know types of oils and ba and bb ratios have a say on the mg per ml
 
Your an old fina guy too. I grew up on a dairy farm always had finaplix-h, synovex-h, and ralgro. The synovex-h was loaded with estrogen. But I read a trick using either to get rid of it. I guess it worked I never grew tits, and that was before I new about AI's. Lol young and dumb

Sent from my SM-S820L using Tapatalk
 
I have seen sources advertise 400 or even 500mg/mL, and labs came back within reason, so id say you can go higher. Using thinner oils and less ba/bb would probably be required, but i havent seen a chemistry set since high school, so dont take my word as gospel.
 
I've seen those sources to brothe that's what has made me ask. Been curious for a long time now just wasn't sure who to ask

Sent from my SM-S820L using Tapatalk
 
i also always thought the higher the mg per ml the more painful the injection was due to the higher ba and bb needed to keep that high mg per ml from having the hormone crash or falling out of the solution/oil its suspended in
 
The first time I did t-400 was in 1999. The next morning i thought someone had shoved a golf ball into my quad. Assumed it was the mgs, cause when I split it didn't happen. Tried again out of curiosity same thing happened.

Sent from my SM-S820L using Tapatalk
 
OK so here is the deal: Every ester goes into solution differently. Depends first on the viscosity of carrier oil (GSO, cottonseed, EO, ethanol, ect.) Second is percentage of Benzyl Benzoate which is a solvent. (typically BA will always stay at 2%)

-- Longer esters can be stable at higher dosage hence why you see deca at 300 and eq at 300 (EQ is almost a liquid in raw). With a combination of different esters and using EO as the carrier, and possibly even more BB to thin it out... You can reach some high mg/ml.

-- Certain AAS like Test P and NPP I personally would never trust above 100mg/ml. Yes, They will hold above 100mg/cc and not crystalize at like 150 or 200 but suppppper painful. (another reason I really don't trust "cut stacks" with 100 tren, 100 prop,and 100 mast.) That blend can be done yes, but it takes some pretty creative measures to create said blend. I will tell you most of the time they are under dosed as to lesson PIP.

Many things are possible I know this, But personally I would stay away from like test 400/500 stuff like that.
 
Last edited:
OK so here is the deal: Every ester goes into solution differently. Depends first on the viscosity of carrier oil (GSO, cottonseed, EO, ethanol, ect.) Second is percentage of Benzyl Benzoate which is a solvent. (typically BA will always stay at 2%)

-- Longer esters can be stable at higher dosage hence why you see deca at 300 and eq at 300 (EQ is almost a liquid in raw). With a combination of different esters and using EO as the carrier, and possibly even more BB to thin it out... You can reach some high mg/ml.

-- Certain AAS like Test P and NPP I personally would never trust above 100mg/ml. Yes, They will hold above 100mg/cc and not crystalize at like 150 or 200 but suppppper painful. (another reason I really don't trust "cut stacks" with 100 tren, 100 prop,and 100 mast.) That blend can be done yes, but it takes some pretty creative measures to create said blend. I will tell you most of the time they are under dosed as to lesson PIP.

Many things are possible I know this, But personally I would stay away from like test 400/500 stuff like that.

Well said daddio! I for one never trusted those high mg/ml steroid blends from under ground labs, as you said it can be done but takes time, and patience
 
Well, if you dont have time or patience, you can have a LOT of PIP instead.

Correct, but there are tried and true solutions that are easy to construct and most any reputable lab can pull off. But just as press and myself have said, the blends can get tricky. It takes a good amount of trial and error. And error just plain sucks cause it just all gets thrown in the trash if done incorrectly or doesn't hold.
 
Correct, but there are tried and true solutions that are easy to construct and most any reputable lab can pull off. But just as press and myself have said, the blends can get tricky. It takes a good amount of trial and error. And error just plain sucks cause it just all gets thrown in the trash if done incorrectly or doesn't hold.
Yup. I dont push enough oil to have to resort to high concentrations, though. Long esters, 2 sites a week rotated every week (using 4 sotes total) i can push 6mL and im good. Usually push 3-4mL, but glutes and quads will hold 3 each easily.

I cant see any other reason to mess with high conc formulations
 
The body can only use 226 mgs at a time jimo of course . So pinning more than that ur just pissing out .

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top