another Duesberg quote-
Retroviruses(this is the class of virus hiv is a member of) are not typically cytocidal,meaning they do not kill cells.
Here is what Harvey bialy,MD,former scientific editor of the journal BIOTECHNOLOGY says-"HIV is an ordinary retrovirus.It only contains a very small piece of genetic information. There is no way it can perform all these elaborate things they say it does"
Nobel Prize winner Kary Mullis,inventor of the PCR(Polymerase chain Reaction) says of the HIV causes aids theory-
"Nobody in their right mind would jump into this thing like they did. it had nothing to do with any well considered science. There were some people that had AIDS and some of them had HIV-NOT EVEN ALL OF THEM. So they had a correlation. So what?"Farber,C."Fatal Distraction"Spin magazine,8number39May 92)p36. It should be noted that correlation does not prove causation.
i could go on (and will if anyone is interested) but I think you get the point. So what causes aids then?
DRUGS. Especially cocaine and nitrate inhalants(poppers). UCLA did a study recently where mice were injected with cocaine. The drug induced group saw a 9 fold DECREASE in immune cells versus the control group(non drug injected mice) poppers have consistently been shown to destroy immune function and have been directly linked to Kaposi's sarcoma, a very rare skin cancer found predominantly in gay men. For the record, the gay male subculture is a drug bonanza where poppers especially are used for sexual excitation and relaxing of the sphincter muscle to facilitate anal penetration.
Can there be AIDS without HIV? Absolutely. In the mid nineties there were at least 6 thousand such cases in the US.But because HIV is not present it is not called AIDS. The Center for Disease Control quickly named this new entity "ICL", which stands for IdiopathicCD-4 lymphocytopenia.(Idiopathic stands for"disease of unknown origin"
i have a best friend living in Baltimore who has a brother that suffers from this. He is openly homosexual, a multitude of sexual partners, uses every drug on the planet,antibiotics(to combat all of the infections-antibiotics suppress natural immune response),has Kaposi's and has repeatedly tested NEGATIVE for HIV and his doctor has diagnosed him with AIDS.
So lets take a quick look at AZT,the treatment of choice for hiv infection. AZT is a chemotheraputic drug that was proposed for cancer patients in the early 1960's. it was turned down by the FDA on grounds it was too toxic. If it is too toxic for cancer patients, then why was it rapidly approved for AIDS patients with broken immune systems in 1985?I have seen pictures of bottles of AZT and it literally has a skull and cross bones on it as a representative of its toxicity. AZT is a DNA chain terminator in which it interupts the replication of cells,thus destroying them. Most experts agree that at most 1 t-helper immune cell in 500 is infected by HIV(and keep in mind that just because the cell is infected does not mean it can not perform its job) and for AZT to kill the one infected cell in 500 it also kills the remaining 499 UNINFECTED t-helper cells. AZT cannot differentiate between infected and uninfected cells. Using this example it can be said that AZT is some 500 times more deadly than HIV. Within weeks of beginning AZT therapy the patient usually experiences anemia as bone marrow function practically ceases, dementia, headaches, severe nausea,acute hepatitis,siezures,and the appearance of cancerous lymphomas in 9 percent of users.
Here is a little bit about transmission of HIV. These dessident scientists can talk until they are blue in the face, but i doubt many people will believe them because this HIV_AIDS theory is literally ground into everyones mind. So despite overwhelming evidence that disproves this theory, lets say you are still convinced that HIV is deadly. Well then you better not engage in anal sex according to Stuart BrodyphD,author of Sex at Risk. i have ordered this book, and have read the rave reviews of it by his peers and colleages. He has studied heterosexual couples where one partner is infected by HIV and the other is not. Couples that perform only vaginal penetration experience virtually no transmission(it is something like .0009%) However in couples that perfrm anal sex hiv transmission is virtually guaranteed. EVEN WITH CONDOMS! The hiv virus is about 450 times smaller than a sperm cell and passes through latex condoms,according to Brody. Might want to reconsider the backdoor thing, but hey, HIV is a latent passenger virus that exudes no cell killing capability whatsoever anyway....