Blog
Eduardo lives up to his standards+Goodvito blows the competition +Patrick looking sick +Nick +Samson
#MrOlympia , #Bodybuilding , #musclecontest , FirPira Braizl , Muscle contest Goodvito blows the competition , Eduardo lived upto his standards , Nick Walker’s impressive waist , Samson looking at his best , Patrick Johnson looking phenomenal Timestamps 0:00 GoodVito 0:55 Vito’s Back 1:28 Eduardo Correa 2:05 Patrick Johnson 3:06 Nick Walker 3:55 Samson fighting…
Turinabol vs Dianabol: Which is the Better Steroid?
Turinabol (Chlorodehydromethyltestosterone) and Dianabol (Methandrostenolone) are very similar anabolic steroids from a chemical perspective, with Turinabol being a derivative of Dianabol.
The only difference on paper is that Turinabol possesses an additional 4-chloro alteration of clostebol.
The objective of German scientists, when creating Turinabol, was to create a compound that replicated the anabolic effects of Dianabol (in terms of muscle hypertrophy and strength); but without the estrogenic effects (fluid retention and gynecomastia).
The purpose of Turinabol’s creation was to give German Olympic swimmers and gymnasts an advantage over their competition.
Due to its similar chemical structure to Dianabol, Turinabol is commonly referred to by bodybuilders as ‘baby Dbol’.
Muscle and Strength Gains
Scientists successfully created a compound (Turinabol) that mimicked the anabolic effects of Dianabol, but without the estrogenic side effects.
In theory, Turinabol should build notably less amounts of muscle mass, with a lower anabolic rating of 54 vs Dianabol’s 210.
However, in practice, bodybuilders often report building a similar amount of lean muscle mass as Dianabol. Although the overall weight gain is more prominent on Dbol due to increased water retention.
Turinabol is the more mild compound on a mg per mg basis, with bodybuilders typically using it in dosages of 40-80mg/day vs Dianabol’s 30-50mg/day. Thus, a higher dosage of Turinabol is required in order to see similar anabolic effects to Dianabol.
A beginner steroid user taking a standard dose of Turinabol is likely to gain up to 15lbs of weight from a 6-8 week cycle. Almost all of this weight will be in the form of lean muscle tissue.
However, a novice taking Dianabol may gain over 20lbs from a 6-week cycle. The majority of this will be muscle mass; however, 20-30% can be attributed to water accumulation.
Both of these anabolic steroids will significantly increase muscular strength. However, Dianabol is likely to be superior in this regard, with it causing notable amounts of intracellular water retention—aiding adenosine triphosphate (ATP) energy production.
However, strength gains on Turinabol are not to be underestimated, with a 1973 report detailing a female shot put athlete increasing her throwing distance by 2 meters in 11 weeks on a dose of 10mg/day (1).
Thus, Dianabol and Turinabol can both be used during bulking cycles; however, Dbol may be the superior compound for sheer mass gain in the short term. Whereas Turinabol is more suitable for bodybuilders trying to lean bulk, whilst remaining as lean and aesthetic-looking as possible.
It is worth noting that results on Dianabol may be obtained notably faster than Turinabol, due to Dbol containing shorter esters and possessing a shorter half-life (3-6 hours vs Tbol’s 16 hours).
Fat Loss
Dianabol is almost always utilized in bulking cycles; however, Turinabol is utilized in both bulking and cutting cycles.
This is due to Turinabol failing to aromatize, rather than it having more potent lipolytic effects. Thus, the actual amount of subcutaneous fat loss will be similar between the two steroids, but users will appear to be leaner on Turinabol, due to less extracellular water retention (and bloating).
Consequently, muscle definition will be more visible and vascularity more prominent on Tbol.
There is a case that Turinabol users may burn increased fat stores indirectly; due to its exceptional endurance-boosting capabilities. In such an instance, calorie expenditure is likely to increase, maximizing fat loss.
Therefore, if someone takes Turinabol and regularly performs cardio, they may burn more fat vs the same person taking Dianabol.
Dianabol actually worsens cardiovascular performance due to it having a deleterious effect on blood lipids. This can also decrease the likelihood that a user will perform regular cardio, as well as negatively affecting cardio workouts; effectively reducing calorie expenditure.
Furthermore, users are more likely to be ingesting fewer calories when cycling Turinabol, with it being viewed as a lean bulking agent, or even a cutting agent. Thus, a correlational relationship between fat loss and Turinabol may also exist.
Side Effects (Safety)
Liver Health
Both Turinabol and Dianabol are oral anabolic steroids and thus c-17 alpha-alkylated. Therefore, ALT (alanine aminotransferase) and AST (aspartate aminotransferase) enzymes will rise on both compounds—signifying liver inflammation.
However, Turinabol’s hepatotoxicity is believed to be less. Consequently, users sometimes report their appetite being strong on Turinabol, but reduced on Dianabol.
This is because when the liver is overtaxed, the body’s defence mechanism is to reduce food consumption, to reduce the workload on the organ.
Although Turinabol may be safer than Dianabol from a hepatic perspective, it is important users don’t become complacent with this fact. Dr. O’Connor once oversaw a patient develop peliosis hepatis, as a result of taking Turinabol for up to 2 years (without a break).
Thus, Turinabol cycles should be kept to 6-8 weeks, and Dianabol cycles 4-6 weeks to prevent hepatic damage. TUDCA (tauroursodeoxycholic acid) can also be taken at 500mg/day to protect the liver on-cycle (2).
Gynecomastia and Water Retention
Turinabol does not aromatize and thus gynecomastia and water retention are not experienced by users, which is contrary to Dianabol usage.
This may be comforting to some bodybuilders, considering the irreversible nature of gynecomastia (without surgery); at least when experienced in the more severe, latter stages.
Testosterone Suppression
Dianabol may cause more impairment to the HPTA (Hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis) than Turinabol, causing lower endogenous testosterone levels.
Consequently, Dianabol may require a more effective post-cycle therapy protocol than Turinabol; such as Clomid and Nolvadex combined, vs just one medication.
Cardiovascular Health
HDL (high-density lipoprotein) and LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol are likely to be more negatively affected by Dianabol, increasing the risk of atherosclerosis.
Hypertension is more of a risk on Dianabol, due to increased blood viscosity (a byproduct of the body retaining more H2o).
Turinabol will also cause an increase in blood pressure, albeit a more modest one.
Oral steroids such as Turinabol and Dianabol are unsuitable for individuals with poor cardiovascular health, due to orals passing through the liver and stimulating hepatic lipase. This enzyme has a reductive effect on low-density lipoprotein and thus increases the risk of myocardial infarction.
Bodybuilders can also lower their cardiovascular risk by taking 4g/day of fish oil, eating a low-sodium diet and performing regular cardio.
Acne and Hair Loss
Acne vulgaris and male pattern baldness are less likely to occur on Turinabol, which has an even lower androgen rating than Dianabol (0 vs 40-60).
Thus, DHT (dihydrotestosterone) levels will be less on Turinabol and the sebaceous glands will be less stimulated.
Benign prostate enlargement also will be less of an issue on Turinabol, due to decreased androgenicity.
However, it is worth noting that Dianabol itself is not overly androgenic (which were Dr. Ziegler’s intentions when formulating it); thus androgenic side effects are unlikely to be harsh.
Muscular Endurance
All anabolic steroids should increase muscular endurance in theory, due to an increase in exogenous testosterone and red blood cell production.
However, because of spikes in blood pressure and liver damage, energy and blood flow can become compromised—affecting muscular endurance.
Thus, compounds like Turinabol have an excellent balance of spiking serum testosterone to high levels, whilst minimizing excessive cardiotoxicity and hepatotoxicity.
Suitability for Women
Dianabol is known to cause virilization in women. In contrast, Turinabol is better tolerated by females, due to less androgenicity.
Female Olympic athletes did not experience virilization in the first few years of Turinabol-use. Consequently, many female bodybuilders have successfully utilized Tbol in small dosages.
Various German Olympic women did experience masculinization effects after the initial first few years of Turinabol-use. However, the reasons for such may be due to not cycling off and the presence of other virilizing anabolic steroids in their systems — such as testosterone esters and Deca Durabolin (which were commonly cycled alongside Turinabol in the 1970s).
Conclusion
Turinabol replicates many of Dianabol’s benefits, but with reduced toxicity.
Bodybuilders commonly report building similar amounts of lean muscle on Turinabol vs Dianabol, and with decreased fluctuations in size.
It is common for Dianabol-users to blow up faster, but then lose some hypertrophy during cycle cessation (due to water loss).
Endurance athletes and those who regularly perform cardio will also be benefited from Turinabol, due to its non-aromatizing nature (preventing excessive weight gain).
Women are also more suited to cycling Turinabol, which is one of the few female-friendly anabolic steroids available today.
Does The Anabolic Window Exist?
In this video, I discuss the anabolic window.
Alex Rogers is a supplement manufacturing expert. He has been formulating, consulting, & manufacturing dietary supplements since 1998. Alex invented protein customization in 1998 & was the first company to allow consumers to create their own protein blends. He helped create the first supplement to contain natural follistatin, invented whey protein with egg lecithin, & recently imported the world’s first 100% hydrolyzed whey.
Evolutionary.org 499 – SARMS – S-23 Doses Cycles Benefits Side Effects
1x 0:00 00:32:01 Evolutionary.org 499 – SARMS – S-23 Doses Cycles Benefits Side Effects Your hosts Stevesmi and Da Mobster discuss the Sarm S-23 doses, cycles, benefits and its Side Effects • We look at how it came to be created• How does it compare to AAS• Its use, at higher doses, as a potential…
2022 Sheru Classic Mumbai Scorecards
/* custom css */
.tdi_86{
color: #eaeaea;
}
IFBB PROFESSIONAL LEAGUE®, IFBB PRO LEAGUE®, IFBB PRO® and the IFBB Professional League logo are registered trademarks owned by the IFBB Professional League.The IFBB Professional League logo cannot be altered in any way, shape or form without the expressed written approval of the IFBB Professional League. Where such approval is granted, the IFBB Professional League will provide the altered logo.
© 2022 IFBB Pro, All Rights Reserved.
2022 EVLS Prague Pro Scorecards
/* custom css */
.tdi_86{
color: #eaeaea;
}
IFBB PROFESSIONAL LEAGUE®, IFBB PRO LEAGUE®, IFBB PRO® and the IFBB Professional League logo are registered trademarks owned by the IFBB Professional League.The IFBB Professional League logo cannot be altered in any way, shape or form without the expressed written approval of the IFBB Professional League. Where such approval is granted, the IFBB Professional League will provide the altered logo.
© 2022 IFBB Pro, All Rights Reserved.
2022 Baltimore Pro Masters Scorecards
MEN’S BODYBUILDING OVER 35 No NAME COUNTRY JUDGING FINALS TOTAL PLACE 1 Chris Barnes Charlottesville, Virginia 9 9 3 2 Peter Boncardo Canada 24 24 8 3 Rafael del Real Tulare, California 19 19 6 4 Denny Singh Chicago, Illinois 12 12 4 5 Stephen Ryan Spaulding Galloway, Ohio 6 …
Krizo & Hoffman Face Off! LIVE 2022 EVLS Prague Pro Judging Results!
Krizo & Hoffman Face Off in Prague! Giles “Tiger” Thomas is in Prague to Give His Expert Opinion! Watch now! Get the Official PPV with Giles “Tiger” Thomas & Lauren Lotter! DISCUSS ON OUR FORUMSSUBSCRIBE TO MD TODAYGET OFFICIAL MD STUFFVISIT OUR STORE ALSO, MAKE SURE TO…
Mat Fraser’s HWPO Will Launch “Lift” Weightlifting Program on Nov. 7, 2022
Mat Fraser is building a coalition. On Nov. 7, 2022, his organization Hard Work Pays Off (HWPO) Training will launch a new branch of its coaching service called “HWPO Lift.”
Lift, a 12-week Olympic lifting-based strength training cycle, is supervised by Team USA Senior International weightlifting coach Aimee Anaya Everett of Catalyst Athletics.
Everett has stated that a primary goal of Lift is to “take the guesswork out of programming” so participants can sharpen their Olympic lifting skills while still keeping up with the varied challenges presented in CrossFit.
Credit: @hwpotraining
HWPO Chief Executive Officer Matt O’Keefe noted in an internal release that Lift is designed to “meet people where they’re at,” stating that the organization recruited Everett to spearhead Lift’s programming due to her vision and expertise as a weightlifting coach.
What Is HWPO Lift?
The pre-registration period for Lift will open on Oct. 30 and close a week later on Nov. 6, 2022. HWPO notes that participants who pre-register will unlock extra perks such as weekly calls with Everett and detailed program review.
Five-time Fittest Man on Earth® Fraser says that, under Everett, Lift will improve your Olympic lifting positional strength, technique, and movement quality; without having to give up your engine along the way.
Here’s what comes with Lift:
12 weeks of weightlifting-specific programming for the snatch, clean & jerk, and their accessories.
Optional conditioning circuits and metcons attached to the end of every training day.
Access to the HWPO Training App and its movement library.
Entry into the members-and-staff only HWPO community forum on the Circle app.
Building two separate athletic qualities in tandem takes both expertise and experience. Lift coach Everett has an extensive resume supervising athletes at the highest levels of both sports.
Who Is Aimee Anaya Everett?
Everett made history at last summer’s Tokyo Olympics as the first female weightlifting coach to attend a Games with Team USA. However, she began her coaching resume long before 2021. Everett coached the first-ever women’s CrossFit Games champion, Jolie Gentry, at the inaugural event in 2007.
Credit: @hwpotraining
[Related: IWF President Speaks on Diversity in Weightlifting and Successes of Tokyo Olympics]
Since then, Everett has stewarded athletes at Regionals and the Games themselves five times each. In recent years, she’s focused more exclusively on working with the best Olympic lifters in America.
Her achievements in competitive weightlifting as a coach include:
15 American Records
2 Pan-American Records
Along with multiple appearances at the World Weightlifting Championships (WWC). Everett personally coaches weightlifter Mattie Rogers, the United States’ most decorated Olympic lifter of the past decade. Rogers and Everett won a silver medal at the 2021 Worlds and are set to compete at the upcoming WWC in Colombia this December.
Hard Work Works
Fraser’s HWPO is rapidly becoming one of the most robust operations in functional fitness. Everett is but the latest pickup in a string of high-profile recruitments.
As the head of Lift, Everett boards HWPO alongside athletes like Amanda Barnhart, Mal O’Brien, and Sam Kwant, as well as strongman Rob Kearney. Kearney, a record-holding competitor in the log lift, oversees HWPO Strong.
Giving Everett the reins to Lift indicates that Fraser knows who the right people are for his people. HWPO Lift takes flight on Nov. 7, 2022.
Featured Image: @hwpotraining
DORIAN YATES TALKS OLD-SCHOOL TRAINING ON THE MENACE PODCAST
Dorian Yates was the standard-bearer in bodybuilding for the majority of the 1990’s. He is the only British Mr. Olympia winner, having held the title from 1992 to 1997. 25 years after his retirement from the sport, Yates is still considered a legend. Yates joined fellow ’90s bodybuilders Milos Sarcev, Dennis James and Chris Cormier…
