Nikon
New member
I also wanted to post this brief review from a member of another forum that really seems to know his stuff.
His thread is the most informative one I have found relating to the use of Trest/DTA.
I have to give credit where credit is due, so here is the link to his thread. http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/252854-fps-review-trest.html
I highly recommend checking it out if you have ANY interest in Pure Oils products.
1) Characteristics of Trest
First, a little back ground
- http://www.ironmagazine.com/2012/tre...ent-explained/
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=trestolone
There are a host of studies indicating the Trestolone (MENT) is a viable option in the medical/anti-agiing community. Basically, the studies summarize Trestolone as:
1) Extremely anabolic, roughly 2300:650 anabolic:androgenic ratio
2) Strong binding similar to Trenbolone, but behaves much like Testosterone
3) Although methylated, its hardly toxic
4) Converts to a methyl-estrogen quite readily
5) Half as hard on the prostate as Testosterone
6) Reports of elevated mood and libido
Bodybuilding communities have labeled it wet Tren and have concluded that it is useful in all but contest prep
Recently I did an 8 week cycle of this stuff and ran it up to as high as 25mg/day. I wanted to assess its ability to replace Test in TRT. 25mg/day is a low-moderate dose and is hardly considered abusive. Rest assured, next time the dose will be upwards of 100mg/day.
2) Positives
I think its gonna be hard to capture all the positives in one sweep, so as I recognize things about Trest that were better than Test, I'll come back to it and update. Trestolone Acetate, while not naturally found in the body, seems to be everything the natural sex hormone Test should have been. I mean, the stuff is incredible even at a low dose, making it practical to use for long periods of time or in combination with TRT. As I've said before, this stuff *****s Tren in potency, yet without making you feel insane or like death. The anabolic nature is obvious yet at 25mg/day, all of its characteristics are considered "tame". You don't realize how good it is until you stop taking it and go back to Test or PCT. As a TRT replacement, I give it a thumbs up. But really, ya'll are wanting to know how it stacks up in the typical KPI's that we track with steroids. So here you go:
1) Strength - its better than Test, but perhaps not as prevalent as Tren. I have not taken 300mg/wk yet, so I bet the strength factor is pretty impressive at those doses.
2) Pumps feel like Tren, but with less hour to hour vascularity. What I mean by that is the vascularity seems to show more when working the muscle, not just all the time.
3) Sex drive/mood - It *****s a high dose of Test and Masteron. I don't know that drug v. drug that anything else could compete.
4) Stamina - Like EQ
5) Recovery - Like EQ/Test/Tren. It really shines the most in this area. I'd compare it to Msten/DMZ in this area.
6) Cutting ability - While its not best suited for this, if you control the estrogen, you'll easily cut with it and significant
amounts in a short period of time. Remember, I only use 175mg/wk!
7) Bulking ability - Obviously in its most useful state here. High doses would likely deliver the best with the best results. More on this later when I review its bulking capability in the Decanoate ester and at higher doses.
3) Negatives
Honestly, estrogen conversion is all. I mean, we need that estrogen conversion to mimic Test, but it does have that tricky methyl-estrogen to deal with. As long as an AI is used throughout, its ok.
For the acetate, the daily IM doses. It sucks. It gets old. I hate it. Good thing its now in the Deconoate version, which at a low dose might be the nail in the coffin for Test in my TRT regimen. Granted, Trest Dec will be entirely different in a multitude of ways from the acetate version.
4) Formabolic - Good for IM AAS or sissy designer use only?
5) Best practices for Formabolic
6) Best application of Form
His thread is the most informative one I have found relating to the use of Trest/DTA.
I have to give credit where credit is due, so here is the link to his thread. http://anabolicminds.com/forum/cycle-info/252854-fps-review-trest.html
I highly recommend checking it out if you have ANY interest in Pure Oils products.
1) Characteristics of Trest
First, a little back ground
- http://www.ironmagazine.com/2012/tre...ent-explained/
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=trestolone
There are a host of studies indicating the Trestolone (MENT) is a viable option in the medical/anti-agiing community. Basically, the studies summarize Trestolone as:
1) Extremely anabolic, roughly 2300:650 anabolic:androgenic ratio
2) Strong binding similar to Trenbolone, but behaves much like Testosterone
3) Although methylated, its hardly toxic
4) Converts to a methyl-estrogen quite readily
5) Half as hard on the prostate as Testosterone
6) Reports of elevated mood and libido
Bodybuilding communities have labeled it wet Tren and have concluded that it is useful in all but contest prep
Recently I did an 8 week cycle of this stuff and ran it up to as high as 25mg/day. I wanted to assess its ability to replace Test in TRT. 25mg/day is a low-moderate dose and is hardly considered abusive. Rest assured, next time the dose will be upwards of 100mg/day.
2) Positives
I think its gonna be hard to capture all the positives in one sweep, so as I recognize things about Trest that were better than Test, I'll come back to it and update. Trestolone Acetate, while not naturally found in the body, seems to be everything the natural sex hormone Test should have been. I mean, the stuff is incredible even at a low dose, making it practical to use for long periods of time or in combination with TRT. As I've said before, this stuff *****s Tren in potency, yet without making you feel insane or like death. The anabolic nature is obvious yet at 25mg/day, all of its characteristics are considered "tame". You don't realize how good it is until you stop taking it and go back to Test or PCT. As a TRT replacement, I give it a thumbs up. But really, ya'll are wanting to know how it stacks up in the typical KPI's that we track with steroids. So here you go:
1) Strength - its better than Test, but perhaps not as prevalent as Tren. I have not taken 300mg/wk yet, so I bet the strength factor is pretty impressive at those doses.
2) Pumps feel like Tren, but with less hour to hour vascularity. What I mean by that is the vascularity seems to show more when working the muscle, not just all the time.
3) Sex drive/mood - It *****s a high dose of Test and Masteron. I don't know that drug v. drug that anything else could compete.
4) Stamina - Like EQ
5) Recovery - Like EQ/Test/Tren. It really shines the most in this area. I'd compare it to Msten/DMZ in this area.
6) Cutting ability - While its not best suited for this, if you control the estrogen, you'll easily cut with it and significant
amounts in a short period of time. Remember, I only use 175mg/wk!
7) Bulking ability - Obviously in its most useful state here. High doses would likely deliver the best with the best results. More on this later when I review its bulking capability in the Decanoate ester and at higher doses.
3) Negatives
Honestly, estrogen conversion is all. I mean, we need that estrogen conversion to mimic Test, but it does have that tricky methyl-estrogen to deal with. As long as an AI is used throughout, its ok.
For the acetate, the daily IM doses. It sucks. It gets old. I hate it. Good thing its now in the Deconoate version, which at a low dose might be the nail in the coffin for Test in my TRT regimen. Granted, Trest Dec will be entirely different in a multitude of ways from the acetate version.
4) Formabolic - Good for IM AAS or sissy designer use only?
5) Best practices for Formabolic
6) Best application of Form
