Don't use gropep

napsgearhttps://ugloz.is/ domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsYOURMUSCLESHOPUGFREAK
bodybybob said:
grow prep sends the product in its freeze dried form,in its freeze dried forem it is very stable ,thats what freeze dried means ,so the sources get it in its freeze dried form and then they add the BA before sending it to the customer and MR sends it overnight in an insulated box with a lce pack,i got it the next day and the pack was still cold ,thye also send all the med.info on the product and it should be kept in your refrigeraters frezzer wich is -15 degrees ,i have been useing it and it is doining what its supposed to do ,i am useing 30mcg.per day ,once a day ,i am on day nine and already see results ,do not expect big results although it works better if combined with aas,it should be used for long term use that way lets say in a year you could have put on a total of anyware from 15 - 30 lbs.thats why you see the pros getting bigger each year,you also will get better results if you use slin along with it since the slin keeps it circulating in the bllod stream for much longer a period of time ,i also know of some bros trhat are getting it from another source and are quite happy with the results ,but this product has to be used for long periods of time at one month on and one month off


Just a technicality, but slin won't have any effect on the active life of LR3. It will have an effect on the active life (so to speak) of regular IGF-1, as it increases IGFBP3 levels, which is both good and bad. Insulin also is thought to be responsible for increased synthesis of hepatic IGF-1.
 
well i beg to differe with you but slin increases the binding protien that is part of igf-1r3 which means it keeps the igf-1r3 more active in the blood stream,i dont remeber where the posts are on this ,maybe even on this site but it explains why the slin dose this to igf-1r3,it extends the active life span up to 12 hrs in the blood stream which is almost bouble of what the active life span is without igf-1r3
 
i meant it doubles the life span of the igf-1r3 (slin)12hrs as opposed to( 6hrs more or less) of igf-1r3 without useing slin,dont these posts have an editing button ?so i dont have to satrt a new reply?
 
bodybybob said:
well i beg to differe with you but slin increases the binding protien that is part of igf-1r3 which means it keeps the igf-1r3 more active in the blood stream,i dont remeber where the posts are on this ,maybe even on this site but it explains why the slin dose this to igf-1r3,it extends the active life span up to 12 hrs in the blood stream which is almost bouble of what the active life span is without igf-1r3

LR3 IGF-1 is not susceptible to being bound by IGFBPs....the "L" is the reason for that. LR3 has a region of porcine GH attached to its N terminus which renders it unsusceptible to binding by IGFBPs, hence its long half-life. Regular IGF-1 can be bound by IGFBPs, and insulin will hinder the proteolytic enzymes responsible for degrading IGFBPs and also increase the half-life of IGF-1 because there will be more IGFBPs to bind and protect the IGF-1. However, IGF-1 cannot bind its receptors while bound to IGFBPs, so extending the half life at the expense of not being able to bind and do its job is not so desirable. Since IGF-1 is what feeds into the negative feedback loop of GH--> IGF-1, and GH is released when IGF-1 levels get low enough, it is more beneficial to have les IGFBPs so that IGF-1 is more free to bind and will also be upregulated more frequently.


You don't have a clear understanding of what's going on, which is fine, but don't pontificate and mislead others.
 
the point is if you add slin to the igf-1r3 ,not at the same time you will extend the time the igf-1 stays in your body,i might not of used the right termenology ,but the point was that again useing slin in the stack extends the life of the igf-1,so it seems to me you might not know what you are talking about if you dont know slin along with igf-1 extends the life of the igf-1
 
Last edited:
read the section on igf-1 and slin(From: Basskiller)

IGF1, also known as somatomedin C, is polypeptide hormone about the same size as insulin. It is produced predominantly in the liver in response to growth hormone (GH) release from the pituitary gland. Many of the growth promoting effects of GH are due to its ability to release IGF1 from the liver. The conversion ratio of GH to IGF1 varies greatly in different individuals but most external sources of GH convert around 4-6mcg of IGF per one I.U. of GH. IGF-1 acts on several different tissues to enhance growth. IGF1 belongs in the 'superfamily' of substances known as 'growth factors,' along with epidermal (skin), transforming; platelet derived fibroblast, nerve, and ciliary neurotrophic growth factors. None of the other factors have any bearing on exoskeletal tissue incidentally however These agents all have in common the ability to stimulate cell division, known as mitogenesis, and cell differentiation. Meaning That In the case of IGF1 which does act on muscle tissue it will initiate the growth of new muscle fibers, and subsequently new receptors for testosterone. Users have unanimously concluded that it enhances cycles of steroids significantly. They also seem to be adamant about its ability to reduce fat and improve vascularity a great deal.

The IGF1 Hype

There is a considerable amount of hype surrounding IGF1. Every one is blaming the distended bellies of modern Bodybuilders on it. Also the freaky proportions that old bodybuilders that have been around for years are starting to attain. Anti-aging proponents are touting it as the miracle cure for every thing from Parkinson's disease to Alzheimer's. And the medical community has published numerous articles on it for its ability to cause cancer, diabetes and gigantism. While at the same time performing documented experiments on thousands of patients of muscle wasting diseases. And reporting significant turnabouts in there conditions. So what is a guy to think about IGF1 as far as athletic enhancement is concerned? Well first of all you need to know that most experiments conducted with IGF1 do not list the type of IGF used. I have written Dr. Robert Saline of the Swedish rejuvenation institute on several occasions and we have had in-depth discussions on the subject of IGF1 for physical appearance enhancement. He feels it would be unethical to prescribe IGF1 to a bodybuilder to increase muscle mass simply due to the fact that IGF1 has valid applications in the medical community, (Like I could give a rats ass about "ethical"). He can not argue that it is extremely effective as a promoter of muscle growth far beyond what androgens (steroids) alone can offer. Well fortunately in America IGF1 is not a drug (yet) and the FDA has no control over it as of now. This will change in the very near future however, Im absolutely sure of it.

How to use IGF1

Assuming that you have acquired legitimate IGF1 (R3) long chain, That's IGF1 with the binding protein added. You should take dosages ranging from 60mcg up to 120mcg per day in divided doses. One injection in the morning and again at bed time. Never exceed 120mcg in one day. IGF1 can cause serious gastrointestinal problems such as tumors intestinal swelling diarrhea and vomiting. Most IGF1 comes in a concentration of 1000mcg per ML or CC so it makes it easy to measure in an insulin syringe. 10 IU on the syringe is 100mcg. Do the math.

IGF + Insulin

If you plan on doing IGF1 with Insulin, listen closely IGF1 is not that expensive, sure you can get away with using less by including insulin in the stack, but IGF1 and Insulin together have a pro-insulin effect on your blood sugar balance. It can enhance the chances of a hypoglycemic episode ten fold. I would recommend against it for any one not ABSOLUTLY comfortable with insulin or IGF1.

Here is how insulin and IGF1 work together. Igfbp3 is the binding protein, which allows IGF1 to remain active in the system for a long enough period of time to really work its magic. IGF1 by nature has a half-life of less than 10 minutes by its self. The molecule was so small it would escape the blood stream very rapidly. This was the reason IGF1 was so "underground". It took very frequent injections at high dosages to achieve even minimal results. Aside from this reconstituting the compound required a degree in biochemistry. This short acting version was the only IGF1 known until recently IGF1 would have been administered in 100 mcg dosages 4-6 times a day. That is a hell of a lot of IGF1. That explains a lot of the distended bellies. Now with R3 long chain IGF1 and the Binding protein IGFBP3 IGF1 will last up to 6 hours in the system. By binding IGF to the IGFBP3 you make the molecule larger and it gets trapped in the blood stream until the protein is broken down and the IGF molecule escapes. You can further its life by combining Insulin with it, although I here its very risky. Insulin prevents the breakdown of IGFBP3 and leaves the IGF1 molecule roaming free in the blood stream for longer periods of time up to 12 hours as insulin levels return to normal IGFBP3 will begin to break down and the IGF1 will escape from its bound protein IGFBP3 again having a half life of less than 10 minutes.

Insulin should be taken at the normal dosage it is usually administered at minus 10% about 45 minutes prior to the IGF1 infusion. Again let me remind you this can be deadly if you don't know what you are doing. And of course do not use Insulin for the nighttime injection of IGF1 by taking it in the morning you prolong the IGF1's half life to 12 hours and then take a 6 hour injection, you should be fine. Hell if you want to eat a big bowl of rice and drink another 100g of simple carbs 45 minutes before the bed time IGF1 infusion you could spike insulin for at least a few hours of extended IGF1 activity. If your not going to be using insulin in the stack then go ahead and do the same in the morning.

What users report

Users of IGF1 have reported various results but all along the same lines, It does not appear to be dramatically less effective in any one individual (at least not to the best of my knowledge). I have a good friend who had to stop taking IGF1 due to stomach illness that was completely unrelated But he to experienced good gains from it for the 2 weeks he was on it, his dosage was 120mcg per day. One hour after the first injection he went to the gym and immediately told me about the uncontrollable pump he got from just one set.

That would indicate to me that he was experiencing some form of cell volumization. The general consensus on IGF1 seems to be that its benefits are as fallow:

Increased Pump Pumps are reported to be so severe that workouts are often cut short due to lack of ability to the muscle through the full range of motion...ouch

Gains retention is increased if IGF is used in a cycle I am not sure why, but IGF1 seems to make gains on a cycle stick with virtually no post cycle loss. Every bodybuilder I've spoken with seems to think this for some reason. Most of them use drugs like Anadrol or Dianabol with it because of the amount of size attained with these drugs. The usual draw back to these drugs is that in most users there is a post cycle "crash" that occurs, so the reasoning is to toss IGF1 into the stack and grow larger faster with out the post cycle crash blues.

Reverses testicular atrophy

Testicles if shrunken will return to "full swing" so to speak even in the middle of a cycle. If not shrunken they will not shrink during the cycle. This may explain partially why gains are kept after the cycle.

Fatigue

Users report feeling drained and tired all day. This seems to be one of the negative side effects to IGF1, it will make you sleep longer and you will require more sleep at night to feel rested for the morning. This is common with high doses of HGH and exhibited in children, whose IGF1 levels are extraordinarily high. A child needs 4 hours more sleep than an adult on average does. This may be directly or indirectly related to IGF1 levels.

Stiffness

An almost arthritic feeling is commonly associated with high levels of HGH, well IGF1 has the exact same property. IGF1 will cause your hands, fingers and knuckles to ache this is one way you can be sure you got real IGF1.

IGF-1's Side effects

Every thing has a down side. To bake a cake ya gotta brake an egg. IGF1 is no exception. The drug used in larger quantity around the 100mcg+ range will cause headaches, occasional nausea and can contribute to low blood sugar or hypoglycemia in some users. Although I have never heard of this first hand I'm sure its true.

IGF1 will attach its self to the lining of the intestine and cause atrophy of the gut. Every thing IGF1 touches will grow and you have a lot of receptors on the lining of the large intestine and inner wall of the abdominal well. This is what causes the GH gut look. You can easily avoid this by limiting your dosages and cycle lengths. IGF1 cycles should be kept to 4-6 weeks with 4-6 weeks off in-between. IGF-1 is considerably more powerful than HGH and you need to think of it along those lines as far as dosing goes. We all know what to much HGH can do over prolonged periods of usage. The Neanderthal look is definitely not going to win any shows this year. I would recommend 80 mcg a day for 4 weeks at a time you should get good results from that for a while. I don't know if you will need to up the dosage at any point, but I would think in the case of IGF1 it wouldn't matter. If 80mcg doesn't do it for ya, then bump it up to 100 You should definitely feel it at this point If not suspect the IGF1 as being fake. Beyond 120 mcg per day your asking for trouble, This compound demands as much respect as its sister amino Insulin.

Clinical Facts about IGF-1

IGF-1 is a polypeptide of 70 amino acids (7650 daltons), and is one of a number of related insulin-like growth factors present in the circulation. The molecule shows approximately 50% sequence homology with proinsulin and has a number of biological activities similar to insulin. IGF-1 is a mediator of longitudinal growth in humans or how tall you are capable of becoming. Serum IGF-1 concentrations are altered by age, nutritional status, body composition, and growth hormone secretion. A single basal IGF-1 level is useful in the assessment of short stature in children and in nutritional support studies of acutely ill patients. For the diagnosis of acromegaly, a single IGF-1 concentration is more reliable than a random hGH measurement (Oppizi, et al., 1986). IGF-1 can be used for the assessment of disease activity in acromegaly (Barkan, et al., 198.

Almost all (>95%) of serum IGF-1 circulates bound to specific IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs), of which six classes (IGFBPs 1-6) have been identified (Rudd, 1991). BP3 is thought to be the major binding protein



__________________
 
bodybybob said:
the point is if you add slin to the igf-1r3 ,not at the same time you will extend the time the igf-1 stays in your body,i might not of used the right termenology ,but the point was that again useing slin in the stack extends the life of the igf-1,so it seems to me you might not know what you are talking about if you dont know slin along with igf-1 extends the life of the igf-1

I was feeling forgiving for a while with you....that's over now.

IGF-1 LR3 is NOT susceptible to being bound by IGFBPs!!! Period
It is NOT the same as IGF-1 in this respect.
Also, as I explained above, extending the active life of IGF-1 via increased IGFBPs is at the expense of the ability of IGF-1 to bind its receptors while bound to the IGFBPs. The extended half life of IGF-1 in the presence of IGFBPs in high amounts also means the periods of GH release (and therefore subsequent IGF-1 hepatic production) will be less frequent as well. It's debatable whether or not increased IGFBPs are favorable or not.


It's fine if you want to question my explanations, but you need to have some fundemental understanding of what's going on first.

Don't just regurgitate what someone else has said or written. Pretty much all of Basskiller's info is accurate, but it is no way relevant to LR3!

The end
 
what makes you think you are right ,it seems to me he is talking about igf-1r3 and slin its right there in english can you show me anything on research that disclaims what he is saying,i deleted the research that he got all of this info from ,maybe you should read it and a little history on my experience ,i am 70yrs.old i have been training for over 50yrs.hardcore and still am ,in my earlier days i ran three gyms and when juice came out in the late 60s,thats when i started useing ,you probably were not born yet ,my cycles consitst of years not weeks ,i have done slin for quite a few years .so i am in touch with how things feel ,i am useing igf-1 and slin ,i have done the igf-1,by itself so i know how that feels and now i have done igf-1 with slin and i can feel the difference in how long it stays in my body,and it works the way he says ,so what ever research you are reading from its not comeing from first hand experience ,,and i am talking about igf-1r3 if you want i can post the footnotes to his post which are taking from research and you can read them ,also you can go to animals anarchy forums and read the truth about igf-1r3
 
Now to get flamed..

Einstein you mean all the stuff I was reading from you was wrong...LOL

BodyByBob,

Not cool, you come to Einstein's home board and flame him, guess they didn't teach you anything in Mod 101 class. If you have your opinion just state it. Also it would make a difference if you did learn to speak in correct english. Except for the copy and paste by Basskiller, it is extremely hard to understand you. We educated a member and had him on the right track then you made a post which confused the c--p out of him, and all you did was back up our information after.

Einstein agrees with Basskiller and he stated it. So stop trying to pick a fight and the flames...yikes... thank god I am not a mod or admin here.

BBB when Einstein posted "The end" he meant the end which means no more, finish, over..etc

Move on and please watch your english and terminology as you are confusing people with your post.

Take care and Peace!!!
 
bodybybob said:
what makes you think you are right ,it seems to me he is talking about igf-1r3 and slin its right there in english can you show me anything on research that disclaims what he is saying,i deleted the research that he got all of this info from ,maybe you should read it and a little history on my experience ,i am 70yrs.old i have been training for over 50yrs.hardcore and still am ,in my earlier days i ran three gyms and when juice came out in the late 60s,thats when i started useing ,you probably were not born yet ,my cycles consitst of years not weeks ,i have done slin for quite a few years .so i am in touch with how things feel ,i am useing igf-1 and slin ,i have done the igf-1,by itself so i know how that feels and now i have done igf-1 with slin and i can feel the difference in how long it stays in my body,and it works the way he says ,so what ever research you are reading from its not comeing from first hand experience ,,and i am talking about igf-1r3 if you want i can post the footnotes to his post which are taking from research and you can read them ,also you can go to animals anarchy forums and read the truth about igf-1r3

Seriously, It's laughable for you to assume your age and how many cycles you've run will somehow magically change human physiology as we know it. I'm sure I speak for everyone, when I say all that is really impressive.....however irrelevant it may be.
Come to anabolicreview.com and read through the GH/IGF-1/slin forum. Not to sound arrogant, but for anyone that knows me, I don't feel I need to justify my info. Proud, I'd appreciate it if you'd interject a word or two here (hint, hint)

Ignorance in conjunction with obstinance is a shame....ignorance in conjunction with acceptance is honorable

I've used LR3 and I've read about everything you could ever get a hold of regarding IGF-1, including tons of scientific primary literature (i.e. not 3rd party misinterpretations of scientific literature). I'm an MD/PhD student and have done research for several years. I've never owned any gyms, however, and that may somehow be my shortcoming in this little (one-sided) debate....somehow. :rolleyes:

For the last time, IGF-1 LR3 has nothing to do with IGF-1 in regards to IGFBPs! I'm not going to say it again. LR3 is not susceptible to being bound by IGFBPs, that's the reason for its longer active life....the "R3" indicates the glutamine to arginine mutation at the N terminus at amino acid position 3. This confers a greater affinity for the IGF receptors. I could go on all day about this, but it seems as though I'm talking to a wall.
 
you are not talking to a wall but if you think you can mix igf in the vail with water it will spoil withen a few hours all of the igf ,i also have read most of all the techs .about igf since its inception and i also read the gropep techs. a while ago and there is nowhere that it says to mix the igf with BW and it very clearly states that basskiller is talking about igf-1r3 with insulin,and i am also talking from useing the product with and without slin on myself ,and in fact still am ,and i can say that it lasts longer in the body with slin,i also train in hardcore gym where there are two pros training and they are useing the same procedure ,but hey if you want to mix your freeze dried igf-1 with BW go a head ,and i can tell everyone that by useing the slin with the igf-1 ,i am getting result by just injecting once a day since it extends its life in the blood stream,i am doing 40mcg and 4iu of slin and of course if you dont eat every two hrs it can be very dangerouse,so i would say unless you have used slin before and know the signs of hpoglycemia ,dont use them together
 
bodybybob said:
you are not talking to a wall but if you think you can mix igf in the vail with water it will spoil withen a few hours all of the igf ,i also have read most of all the techs .about igf since its inception and i also read the gropep techs. a while ago and there is nowhere that it says to mix the igf with BW and it very clearly states that basskiller is talking about igf-1r3 with insulin,and i am also talking from useing the product with and without slin on myself ,and in fact still am ,and i can say that it lasts longer in the body with slin,i also train in hardcore gym where there are two pros training and they are useing the same procedure ,but hey if you want to mix your freeze dried igf-1 with BW go a head ,and i can tell everyone that by useing the slin with the igf-1 ,i am getting result by just injecting once a day since it extends its life in the blood stream,i am doing 40mcg and 4iu of slin and of course if you dont eat every two hrs it can be very dangerouse,so i would say unless you have used slin before and know the signs of hpoglycemia ,dont use them together

Damn it! Basskiller talks about LR3 in one paragraph, then he goes back to referring to regular IGF-1. IF he is referring to LR3 with slin, which I know he isn't, he simply is wrong...that's all there is to it. This is a simple concept. If you truly have read the tech articles about LR3, you'd know that its main advantage over physiological IGF-1 IS the "L", the region that BLOCKS binding of IGFBPs. I don't care if you have a whole auditorium full of pros there, that doesn't change science and reality. I never said to reconstitute IGF-1 in water, however, if you did, it would NOT all be degraded within minutes. It is better reconstituted in an acidic solvent....that's it. You are NOT extending the active life of LR3 by using slin with it.....that ONLY works with IGF-1 (NOT LR3).

For all of you that read the tech pdf files that give recommended reconstitution and storage suggestions and then treat them as the gospel truth and final word, I pity you. They are simply suggestions based on the various methods they've tried that they've determined worked best for them. The say 10mM HCl or 100mM acetic acid works best based on what they've tried. that doesn't mean that straight BA (which is alcohol BTW not water) will give 99% of the activity that 10mM HCl will.

I'm dead serious now....do not post again until you've read up on this....you're wasting valuable time in which you could be further educating yourself as opposed to making a fool of yourself.

Like I said before, go to anabolicreview. there are numerous research articles that myself and others have posted that'll keep you busy for the rest of your days.
 
well i did go there and as far as i am concerned there are some things that you say are not true and btw i have been comeing here longer than you have ,and i am aware of what you are talking about but i dont agree ,besides there is no proof on any thing you are saying ,you are going by intelectual gooblegoop,and i am reporting what i am experiencing ,so i dont care what you are saying ,i know how it is working on me ,why dont you try it ?instead of trying to prove how smart you are ,science is dissproved everyday ,they still are placeing how dangerouse takeing AAS is in the lit.that comes with the box the steroid vail is in ,its all bullshit ,and the truth is if you use BW to mix the freeze dried igf it will degrade quite rapidly whether you want to believe that or not ,so you can keep callling me whatever you want ,but between us i know what the truth is about you and i will no longer reply to this post,since it is getting noone anywhere and you can not prove what you are saying
 
bodybybob said:
well i did go there and as far as i am concerned there are some things that you say are not true and btw i have been comeing here longer than you have

Well, I guess that proves everything then....since you're older than me and have been coming here a lot longer than me, you're obviously right. Everyone knows....the first person into a room is always right:rolleyes:

Great logic.

Show proof that water will degrade IGF-1


Everything that I write is supported by research, published research. You claim to know otherwise though because "you know what's going on in your body"??? Your old body can distinguish nanomolar fluctuations in IGF-1 levels over the course of hours???


You tell me exactly what I've posted on the AR board that "isn't right" according to you, and I'll do you a favor and dig up the research....real research to support it. Unbiased, peer-reviewed research....not media-driven 3rd party articles or product information articles written by people who have a direct vested interest in the sale of the product being written about.


I'm done commenting too, unless you can bring up something worth while. I think it's clear to anyone who reads this little back-and-forth what the facts are, and that's the only reason I posted in the first place. You posted, in all caps none the less (real tasteful), misinformation that may very well have mislead people. My point is....all you did to support your claims were to refer to 3rd party articles (basskiller's, which you misinterpreted) and to another AAS board!! That's just like someone else arguing on another board and now referring to your post as if it's somehow true, because it's in black and white on the internet.
 
Just the facts..ma'am..

Is it my turn yet? lol
As for IGF and LR3 and all that I do not use or will I ever, nor refer anyone to in that statement. I know titi about ta ta when it comes to thsi topic. Its simply a fact of a pissing contets here. It for everyone to educate themselves on and to learn by what they read, just post what you know or have copied and state your sources like your reference so that anyone even remotely interested may read it and know ehre you come from on the topic, personal opinions are a must in some cases but on this I, Myself, have read many controversial statements throughout the internet world on it!
One with a solvent like BA one with BW and acetic acid(vinegar) Its simply of do more research and maybe get a hold of lab reports. I know some of them are as boring as reading a tampon box but its a must if you are going to put it into your body.

Lets agree to let everyone read what they want and I have read this whole post, it interested me to the point where it became a pissing contest and made me want to delete the whole thread, well its not going to happen but some editing may occur.

I am not perfect but we all should be allowed to read the facts and fiction of everything and then chosse for ourselves what course of action to take.
Lets keep it that way guys..this is about knowledge and let the people decide for themselves.
In no way am I saying who is right or wrong I have made my choice to have nothing to do with it so You will hear no posts about the stuff from me.
Post what you know by personal experience or opinion and dont take it as fact or medical study unless you post the source.
Basskiller knows alot but when it comes to this it may be personal opinion or fact its still unclear what works from some may not work for others. Brand, type, refrigrant temp, and additives will always affect a substance as this in some way or another.
Just keep it clean gentleman and post to inform!
Thanks guys.
 
You're right. Looking back on it, I sound arrogant and more immature than I'd like to admit. I stand by what I say, but I apologize for the way I said it.
 
yes i apoligise for bringing this on a personal level and i will bring it to its basic level,igf-1r3 works better with slin and with a stack of aasif you have not used slin then i will advice you not to use it with the igf,you must first use slin so that you become aware of the signs of going into hypoglycimia ,before useing it with igf,since the both of them together will make you more suseptible for going hypo,but in my experience and some of the bros that train at the gym i train in we get better results useing the igf with slin and a aas cycle
 
bodybybob said:
yes i apoligise for bringing this on a personal level and i will bring it to its basic level,igf-1r3 works better with slin and with a stack of aasif you have not used slin then i will advice you not to use it with the igf,you must first use slin so that you become aware of the signs of going into hypoglycimia ,before useing it with igf,since the both of them together will make you more suseptible for going hypo,but in my experience and some of the bros that train at the gym i train in we get better results useing the igf with slin and a aas cycle

I promise not to go personal again....I'm sorry for that. We can agree to disagree. I will agree that IGF-1, even LR3. works better with slin. However, the reason for this is that IGF-1 upregulates insulin receptors, and insulin upregulates IGF receptors. IGF-1 has some affinity for insulin receptors as well. The combination is very potent, and additional simple carbs should be taken in to compensate.
 
Now that was a hell of a lot better. I agree with both of you. Now lets go into the question what type of insulin, everyone was so busy argueing that nobody said what kind. There are several and some are fast acting and some are longer acting so which one is used to get the results you are talking about, that can make all the difference.
Also what is the size of some of these guys using slin with it?
That can also make a difference in a smaller guy attempting this?
 
strider said:
Now that was a hell of a lot better. I agree with both of you. Now lets go into the question what type of insulin, everyone was so busy argueing that nobody said what kind. There are several and some are fast acting and some are longer acting so which one is used to get the results you are talking about, that can make all the difference.
Also what is the size of some of these guys using slin with it?
That can also make a difference in a smaller guy attempting this?

Humalog is the only way to go IMO. Its activity onset is the fastest as is its potency per unit time. It also has the shortest window of activity, which means you have to have your slin-based (fat-free, carb-controlled) diet for the shortest amount of time.
Anyone can benefit from slin....however, I wouldn't recomend it to everyone. You need to be very careful in using it. 10g or dextrose/IU of slin is a good guideline, but one should start there and eventually ween that number down to as low as they can go w/o going hypo, as any add'l carbs will be stored. Many people get fat off of slin because they overshoot carbs (overcautious) or take in fat (even EFAs will be stored) during the slin window of activity.

When I use slin, I use it 1x at 10IU in the AM (since cortisol levels are highest in the AM....although not really relevent while on AAS) followed by ~7g of glucose (dextrose)/IU, so 70g....10 minutes later I'll take in my whey shake with 70g of whey at this time of the day.....(I also add whole wheat flour for its high peptide value...especially glutamine) 1.5hrs later I have another solid fat free meal with simple carbs and complex carbs based on how I feel or based on my BG.
My post workout is the same except that I take in 100g of whey at this time.

Controlling carbs is the key in addition to avoiding fat during the slin's activity window.

With Humalog, you can assume this to be roiughly 5 hours (to be safe). Obviously, don't take slin w/in 5 hours of bed time (longer for longer acting slins like Humalin-R, etc).

Slin and GH have great synergy....and stacked with AAS, it's simply amazing.....add LR3 into the mix....wow


BTW, if one were to start slin, I'd start at 2IU post w/o only and increase by 1IU/day while adjusting my carb intake to find your INDIVIDUAL need. After you've done that, you can add in an additional slin shot during the day (if you do so desire) and increase the dose as with the post w/o shot. It's optimal to be testing BG before and while you use slin. Going by "feel" works too, if you know what to look for.
 
Back
Top